Quote from: jootn2kx on August 08, 2017, 05:58:19 AM

Quote from: relayd on August 08, 2017, 04:29:22 AM

In other news I'm trying to figure out if skunksp-mod5_fixed was tainted or not.

I have scanned skunksp-mod5_fixed.7z with kaspersky & windows defender (Windows 7) & neither has found anything, further system scans and rootkit scans found nothing on this system.

ccminer.exe - SHA256: c924fcb42c24fc6e0c8062055ad7a493fe9d0b9469c8efe8eebb642e95554ec3
ccminer64.exe - SHA256: 28443864b346eb6ab96a2e9c0155dddea818a3218988e4e6276de7c74d381a9a

However it's possible there is something here, if there is it could be mining some part to another pool in secret.

But I haven't really seen evidence of this so far.

I'll probably just compile ccminer-skunk-krnlx myself later: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.0

If anyone wants to analyze this further, possibly with network tools and such, would be interesting to know, not sure if I will.

Man ... I think you're all are beeing paranoid there is nothing wrong with this "pirated" miner imo
Getting less shares can happen, its not constant it has never been
Difficulty spikes and insane nethash are the mains reasons everyone getting less coins now
Whattomine can't handle these spikes, dont use this calculator its not trustable atm

Agree 100%, paranoia is thick. I've been using the shared spmod3 with zero issues and have netted pretty dang close to the number of coins to be expected. Even if the miner is "tainted" and sending off 1-2% to a secret address, in the end it's better than forking over 0.05 or 0.1 BTC to buy the miner Wink