Quote from: antonio8 on August 09, 2017, 12:36:45 AM

Quote from: sp_ on August 08, 2017, 02:56:19 PM

If you want to know some ccminer history github is a nice place to check.

Here is a commit back in nov 2014: (faster echo512)

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/3cc7e9db091b277d9357b20f2d9101846bee54dc

Here is another commit Jan 2015 (Faster groestl512)

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/1c61d0eebb1ee49bcdb137d5c7291fc0fb3e810d

Every algo have been optimized by me, and I have done it opensource.

If you see the latest alexis fork, he base his work on the same code.

So I did the work, Eplyson copied my work, and Alexis reforked my work. And then They bitch about it when I add some more speed and refuse to share my changes.. Huh

You really tried to go there.

Name one algo that you have released before Epsy or any other Nvidia dev has?

I'll be waiting for that answer.

You release nothing. You copy every algo that Epsy has released that you put in "your" miner.

EVERYONE here needs to wake up and realize the day Epsy stops releasing algo's then this ccminer is done.

Everyone who donates to sp has a backward thought process. The real person who should be getting donations is Epsy for his work in releasing the algo's and code for sp to take and claim as his own.

Here is a question to EVERYONE who has been donating to sp ASK HIM FOR THE SOURCE and he must provide it per the License.

So everyone mining algo's - skunk, dnr and timetravel10 you should really be donating to Epsy for giving you the opportunity to mine it.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=770064.msg19977610#msg19977610 What was wrong. You could not release it yourself?

when you buy a car, do you pay henry ford for making the first car in mass production? No you don't
When you have the choice to get a Cheap car, or the fastest car, which one costs you more? The fastest car of course.
making those improvements is as hard a job as creating the algorithm in the first place. I am a developer myself and I am pretty sure it is not that sp_ can't do the algorithm but it would be most likely a waste of time.
And maybe, just maybe, some coders are really bad at understanding algo's from text but really good at understanding algo's in code. So why waste time creating an slow algo to then improve it instead of just making one faster?