Quote from: bitserve on August 09, 2017, 02:53:20 PM

Quote from: AlexGR on August 09, 2017, 02:34:32 PM

Quote from: Paashaas on August 09, 2017, 01:30:33 PM

The 2x part will never happen in November but who cares? Bigblockers have finally there BCash coin with no Segwit+8mb blocks...thats what they wanted, right?

What they want is control. Block sizes are irrelevant Cool

Miners already have enough control with their hashrate. I prefer a plurality of influencing actors (miners, exchanges, developers, main whales, relevant individuals, users, etc) as a form of power decentralisation.

I do agree block size is not that much relevant (within some common sense boundaries). So that's why I am fine with a moderate (2x) blocksize increase.... delivered by CORE developers and in the safest possible way.

I am totally in disagreement with more power/control "flippening". Let's just have some respect to the "status quo" that have lead us to where we are right now and keep evolving slowly and without ridiculous experiments and power unbalances.

We've already blown past 2x blocksize, as segwit has an effective capacity of 3mb+.

With 2x blocks, that becomes not 2mb, but 7mb.