Quote from: Digi7ech on August 10, 2017, 07:30:32 PM

Saw my 1.5.3 wallet was out of date foe about 8 days so just updated to 1.5.5.2 and downloaded the blockchain from your link.

It's up to date now but is saying none of my coins are aged yet, but they're all at least 15 days old. or did I miss a remark about coin age maturity changing?

///
Edit.
Just saw that my coin totals are off by waaay too much. Only saying I have 38k.

Might just need to do a -rescan Could take sometime so just wait until the debug.log says it is complete.

Quote from: 2xjO9M3P on August 10, 2017, 08:00:48 PM

@Tranz
a preliminary potential bug report for a minor display bug. I will see if I can't find time this weekend to test further and write something more complete, assuming I haven't missed something obvious or stupid.

System: Ubuntu Server 16.04 x64, HoboNickels 1.5.5.0
Affected: listtransactions RPC

Reference:
named address, any address associated with an account
unnamed address, any address not associated with an account
change address, self-explanatory

Issue:

Code:

listtransactions

returns only transactions/stakes with named address

Code:

listtransactions ""

returns transactions/stakes with unnamed address

neither returns stakes created on change addresses, and I found no suitable RPC command to actually list these, outside of parsing blocks/transactions

Expected behaviour:
listtransaction lists all transactions regardless of the "type" of address

Hmmm I don't have any Stakes from Change, but I will try to generate some in test. Thanks for the report.

Quote from: dnp on August 10, 2017, 09:08:45 PM

Quote from: Tranz on August 10, 2017, 01:11:55 PM

Seems to be working here? Did you compile yourself?

no. downloaded from your repository
are there any dependency libs the QT may be finding on my system from years of older wallets?
or is the .exe totally self contained (well, except for the C runtime

)

perhaps this weekend i can find some time to investigate and narrow things down further.
but as i type that validateaddress command into my console window, it faults and likewise
as UNOMP sends the same request it faults.

oh well, i'm sure it will reveal its true nature eventually Cheesy

ps: 64bit windoze 7 ultimate svc.pack 1, AMD phenom quad processor

It is self contained. But possible if you have a .dll in your path it is trying to use it. Do you have another user to try it under or just another simular machine to test. I have tested it on 3 different windows machines and seems to be work ok..

Edit: Ok I had it fail on me on a different machine. I will have a look here as soon as I can.