Quote from: Jackkyy on August 11, 2017, 04:36:22 PM

Quote from: Django69 on August 11, 2017, 08:27:11 AM

Some bench from vega 64 with nicehash 1.8.1.0

keccak 0.724 GH/s
DaggerHashimoto 31.275 MH/s
DaggerDecred 31.317 M/0.940G H/s
DaggerPascal 30.993 M/0.930G H/s
DaggerSia 30.718 M/0.922G H/s
Decred 2.659 GH/s
CryptoNight 800.000 H/s
Lbry 0.192 Gh/s
Pascal 1.668Gh/s
X11Gost 13.400 Mh/s

Claymore 9.8 ETH + SIA
33MH/s - 1011MH/s

Wait good driver for VEGA
or any people make custom
33MH/s is not real for this card

Why should I wait for a good driver? They had the whole summer to get their drivers straight for this release and still I'm sure it will happen again. They will rush a piece of silicon to the market with half-baked software and then gradually improve it over time to keep us occupied.

It could be an interesting business strategy to keep customers locked-in into the product. Imagine you've paid half a grand for for a decent GPU and people keep telling you it can do much better and you can get this improvement for free with a simple driver upgrade if you wait and don't go to competition just yet. No one knows what the full potential of the product actually is but everyone invested hope for the best even if the competition is showing better results.

I understand it is very difficult to get a high quality software release on day one, but this is not the first GPU they ever produced.

We should have a class action law suit going and demand to cover our losses in unrealized mining potential (3.50 ETH) and another 3.50 for the pain and suffering. Per each GPU