Quote from: Majormax on August 13, 2017, 11:12:26 PM

Quote from: germsite on August 13, 2017, 09:08:34 PM

Quote from: Majormax on August 13, 2017, 08:30:35 PM

Quote from: san2ok on August 13, 2017, 08:08:03 PM

Quote from: K~Ehleyr on August 13, 2017, 01:59:38 PM

Woohoo, iCEy's back!!!!!!!!!!!! Bullish!!!!!!!!

hahaha, so funny, our indicator is iCE's fud

iCE is not FUDing with the same conviction now. I find it difficult to follow the argument about the instamine, as if anyone can plan anything in the Crypto space.

Ah ok, so it's still the instamine. Not really worth the effort to mention it over and over again, but back then - to be honest - it made a single actor pretty rich. That is a fact. Anyway, time goes on.

I don't know if that is all .... However, I don't believe instamines are a negative. Wealthy holders have more capital and incentive to promote, and even if they dump, that increases the distribution.

Wealth distribution in fiat money is very uneven, and the richest are not always there on merit. Competent wealth owners usually benefit the economy, and incompetent ones often redistribute their money.

You make a valid point of course, but instamines in crypto are to be seen negatively for good reasons I think. In most cases they get abused for dumping. If there was a huge instamine, being transparent about it would have helped a great deal maybe. But yes, as you said, we are all asking for equality, but then again it nowhere exists anyway.