Quote from: AGD on August 23, 2017, 09:57:56 AM

Quote from: e1ght on August 23, 2017, 09:53:00 AM

Quote from: AGD on August 23, 2017, 09:33:50 AM

Quote from: e1ght on August 23, 2017, 08:59:00 AM

Quote from: AGD on August 23, 2017, 08:43:35 AM

Quote from: e1ght on August 23, 2017, 08:41:14 AM

Quote from: AGD on August 23, 2017, 08:20:06 AM

Just an idea. If Craig Wright is NOT Satoshi Nakamoto, he would definitely risk the real Satoshi come up with a proof, that Craig is not SN. Is it possible, that CW explicitly knows about the death of the person behind SN, so he can make his claims without backing them up with a proof? Roll Eyes

No, he knows that Satoshi Nakamoto, whoever they are, would not risk communicating with the world ever again. (its kinda obvious why)

To me it's not obvious. Please explain.

Well according to some blockchain analysts, Satoshi is sitting on billions of US dollars worth of Bitcoin.
If I was them, I wouldn't risk any possibility of being traced. This includes making a post on the internet or really doing anything online that involves that username.

So you would never spend a satoshi from your wealth and keep hiding? Then what would you do this for?

The government may want to question you and keep you on watch if you made something that could replace the currency they're built on.

The gov. should know (as Satoshi should also know btw), that he can't change the bitcoin system to a gov friendly system. It will not be accepted by the Bitcoin community. He has one voice as every developer has. He wouldn't be in danger only because he created a code he can't change anymore. He might be in danger because of the potential money that he holds, but a burn address would delete this problem as well.

I see where you're coming from, burning the bitcoin would be a solution.
It's possible they just don't want to have to deal with the issues that arise after burning is done (and they reveal their identity w/ proof).