We can raise funding through voluntary donations, there is no need for a forced deevaluation of ones assets.
This is delusional. The so-called assets have near-zero value at this point, especially considering lack of liquidity if trying to sell them.
A proposal to raise capital and put new effort to (re)build the game into something of significant value is 'devaluing' nothing. I take no position on the 10% specifically, but the idea that a made up database currency in a nearly-defunct game can't be diluted as part of a viable plan is taking things too far. The game owners can consider it IMO. Maybe it still gets rejected, which is fine.
What precisely does the game need to do with this 10%?
That should certainly be in any such proposal.
It's just my personal principle, ofcourse if others think this is better for the game, I'll be more than happy to go along.
I understand your principle, but you could also consider this to be a complete reboot of the game where existing holders get some percentage of the new supply as an airdrop (pretty generous!). Given that the game is essentially dead in the water, that's not an unreasonable approach at all.
Again, I'm neutral on the idea, but at this point those of us who want to see something positive come out of this game should be open to a variety of proposals, and evaluate available credible proposals against each other not against some fantasy where nothing of substance changes in the game and suddenly it is worth $100 million.