Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on August 25, 2017, 08:47:31 PM

Quote from: SatoNatomato on August 25, 2017, 08:39:22 PM

IOTA has PoW, yet it can be easily attacked, so much, that you need to have a centralized Coordinator. Why is that, PoW in Iota does not secure it? You cant just add massive amounts of PoW to secure it? But instead rely on 1 special Coordinator? What a baby.

Coordinator protects against 34% attacks, it's not related to anti-spam.

Quote from: SatoNatomato on August 25, 2017, 08:39:22 PM

I think you are confusing the way IOTA works with the way Byteball works.

I learned a lot about Byteball during my last testing, I think it's you who confuse that.

Quote from: SatoNatomato on August 25, 2017, 08:39:22 PM

If you can attack it, go ahead attack it, your last "attack" which stalled the network for 6h, was due to a bug in the archiving of units, not anything with the consensus algorithm of Byteball or PoW, and because the 12 witnesses are still run my main dev and not other known real world entities.

Then it's a no-brainer for you to bet, for example, 8 BTC. Easy money for you. So?

Quote from: SatoNatomato on August 25, 2017, 08:39:22 PM

I bet you there is other flaws and bugs in Byteball, as there is in any software, and in IOTA - but IOTA has a bug which cant be fixed - a conceptual retarded mistake. Cheesy

I can repeat my attack again and again until all bugs are fixed and then I'll do the attack once again. What do you think of that?

Deflect on Byteball all you want, your challenge to a bet only reveals that my statements concerning your latest scam coin IOTA are valid and correct. Cheesy

Nope, I still wont recommend to anyone in the IoT industry to choose IOTA for anything, but will recommend Byteball as it is the first DAG-based design with no architectural limits on scaling. You can stay butthurt about that.