Quote from: korvas128 on August 26, 2017, 11:46:12 PM

Quote from: o0o0 on August 26, 2017, 07:35:06 PM

Quote from: korvas128 on August 26, 2017, 12:32:24 PM

Quote from: o0o0 on August 26, 2017, 10:40:23 AM

Quote from: korvas128 on August 26, 2017, 09:11:11 AM

Quote from: drwoo on August 25, 2017, 09:59:15 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on August 25, 2017, 12:49:58 AM

Quote from: drwoo on August 24, 2017, 11:05:13 PM

What's the trouble all about? Did the devs stop delivering or are people just too impatient again?

They never started delivering. It's been a year since they announced a "one game a month" roadmap and haven't delivered even a single complete game.

Instead they're now announcing a bunch of new and regurgitated bullshit and are asking for more money.

Ok so this is a really bad sign then -.- will dig a little bit deeper into this, but based on your information this is probably a safe skip. Thank you

The current roadmap is old and soon to be updated

With Suchmoon you'll eventually figure out that you should never take her comments at face value as she does like to play. For instance the one game a month comment Ionomy made is correct BUT this comment was made at the start when the original plan was to churn out simple tap games alla 'ketchapp', the comment is 17ish months old.

Your on the right track of maintaining a watching brief

was that the same roadmap that they sold the ico to customers that expected that done korvas?
also they mentioned transparency on their page that you were going to cover for me can you explain how they are transparent? they say they are but aside from a few bounty addresses i cant see any transparency on spent funds... would you say its a possibility it could of bren all spent paying themselves? as a possibility i mean theres no certainty they did or didnt unless there was some transparency... thoughts?

No, This was the roadmap at ICO...

Feel free to rip it apart

Today ION is at $1.6 which is a fair value when you reflect on Ionomy status today vs their original roadmap. Now imagine if they had been able to deliver everything on that roadmap what would the value of ION be now ?

PWR-GRD is soon to be announced and start it's implementation....... compare that to the original roadmap...... similar isn't it. As a worse case scenario imagine a partial implemention again what do you think that would have to the value of ION.

I did answer your point about transparency you just don't like my answer

so just so we both are on the same page. your transparency answer was youve known the tea team for a while. is this correct and your teansparency validation?

Stop trying to bait me, when it comes to proper due diligence the human element is just one factor. To ignore this in crypto a place where pretty much everything can be fabricated is to do so at your peril.

No easy way to test the integrity of a person or business other than to watch and this takes time.

Your post May 08 2016.... 16 months ago

I'm saying the same thing now as I told you then... you know.... when ION was like $.15 to $.20. It's now $1.68 a markup of 740% and the team are still here not going anywhere any time soon

I believe he asked about transparency, not about the price. Why does every question asked to you end with the price of ION? How does the price indicate transparency? Just curious as your two biggest statements about transparency are they are nice and you post the ION price.

How about blockchain addresses?