Quote from: chimk on October 17, 2019, 02:35:34 AM

Quote from: KTChampions on October 14, 2019, 11:03:02 PM

Quote from: chimk on October 14, 2019, 09:08:23 PM

He exaggerates calling Craig Wright the creator of Bitcoin
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5148832.msg51273720#msg51273720

Old lie.

The accusation of lying, as always arrogant and untenable. Angry

https://i.imgur.com/hzIUbdy.jpg

I'll start with the accusation of lying.
Subject: The creator of Bitcoin on the BTC.
Created by KTChampions.
Article: Shades of Black ...
Posted by Crag Wright.
http://archive.md/VzVPH

where is the lie? I do not like your many false accusations, in different forum topics. I'm starting to think that you can inflict unreasonable damage to the reputation of any user.

Firstly, inaccurate translation, the real Subject is "The creator of Bitcoin about the BTC."
It is clear to any normal person that Bitcoin = BTC. But Crag Wright doesn't think so and therefore this expression is used. This topic is a translation of Craig's article. Why are you surprised that it is named so? You read it and did not understand? Or are you just looking for another reason to lie about me?

Quote from: chimk on October 17, 2019, 02:35:34 AM

When I said that the title of the topic is disorientation, he referred to the opinion of the US government agency, calling the remaining opinions fantasies. Although this is no longer relevant to his accusation of lying. Roll Eyes

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5148832.msg51274166#msg51274166

I always propose an objective consideration of the facts, if the facts cannot be established accurately, then only opinions remain. They can be any. Like it or not.

Quote from: chimk on October 17, 2019, 02:35:34 AM

If you follow his link, you can die of laughter, be careful. Cheesy

Quote from: KTChampions on July 31, 2019, 10:56:26 AM

About Craig - I call him scamer, that's a fact.

About my bitcoin criticism - i am a real crypto enthusiast, so naturally I want to make the system better. What is needed for that? See the flaws and fix them. This is the criticism.
Naturally, with such a position, I can have nothing in common with fiat slaves - they dream only about one thing - about the growth of Bitcoin (fiat price) and about its sale.
90% of ru local users are fiat slaves, participants of ICO scams and ponzi schemes - they are fake crypto-enthusiasts.

Why are there such big words when in reality in the Russian section the opposite is true?

Why does he consider the creator of Bitcoin, fake Satoshi, a scammer?
KTChampions repeatedly calls Bitcoin a financial pyramid fraud and compares it with the famous criminal pyramids of Russia, for example, MMM.
~

Thanks to fiat prostitutes like you, bitcoin really has long and far gone from the initial idea. And besides the payment system, part of bitcoin is a pyramid. I have such an opinion. Do you forbid me to have it? Grin

As for the quotes that you pulled from my> 1,700 posts (out of context), this is just ridiculous, can you really find something really serious against me?

Quote from: chimk on October 17, 2019, 02:35:34 AM

KTChampions, its you who came to META with corruption charges and did not provide them. KTChampions, this you repeatedly repeat in META and in the Russian section that I am a defender of the scammer. I, just like everyone, refused to paint without strong evidence. I have the right to have my own opinion, and other users, and even more so members of the DT, should be independent. On June 30, when new charges appeared that were not related to the bumping service with which you came here, I wrote the following -

Quote from: chimk on June 30, 2019, 03:07:41 PM

Я тoлькo зaшeл дoмoй. ни кaкиx пpoтивopeчий и пpoблeм тyт нeт. Ecли нa cмapтмaнa ecть дoкaзaтeльcтвa в мoшeнничecтвe или cвязь c зaблoкиpoвaнными aккayнтaми, знaчит этo pядoвoй cлyчaй. oн ничeм нe лyчшe дpyгиx и дoлжeн быть или пoкpaшeн зa мoшeнничecтвo или зaблoкиpoвaн пo п. 25, ecли ecть yклoнeниe oт бaнa.

Translation - This is a common case that is no different from others. If there is fraud, he must have a mark in TRUST. If there is a connection with other blocked accounts, the rule No. 25 applies.

Until June 30, this case was not and other strong evidence, also was not.

I am not a defender of fraudsters, you repeatedly disseminate slander in the Russian section and harass me with false accusations.

A beautiful fairy tale, and the facts are here in English and anyone can easily check them.

Quote from: chimk on October 17, 2019, 02:35:34 AM

KTChampions, if there is a mark in TRUST from the user DT, with Reference, why put others? Users are already warned. Why insult people who express their opinion in the Russian section? Why do you persecute people dozens of times for not hard actions, for which they have a mark in TRUST? Why are you creating an atmosphere of fear in the Russian section? You come to META and you're lying. Why are you surprised that your opinion is not the main thing? KTChampions, are you the chief prosecutor? No, KTChampions, you are the main hater of the Russian section. You never understood the bitcoin community, it has a meritocracy. The last case with be.open, upset many. lovesmayfamilis changed TRUST because earlier, she added to her TRUST list.

Quote from: lovesmayfamilis on October 13, 2019, 02:04:42 PM

...
К coжaлeнию этo бayнти читинг.
Mнe oчeнь жaль, нo я былa тoй, ктo дoбaвилa в cвoй тpacт лиcт be.open, и пoкpaшy eгo тoжe нaвepнoe я. Sad

Я caмa вce пpoвepилa.

Show me please this tag? Roll Eyes

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=986242
May be i'm blind?

Everything happened as I expected - there was one honest person in Ru local. Nobody supported her, on the contrary, she was insulted by the crowd, and after lengthy discussions of this kind they brought her to the point of removing her tag. There is not even a neutral mark.

Should I bring all these dirty quotes here? Do you want me to show all this shit here? Or are you smart enough not to dispute this?

And after that, you have the audacity to say that its me (and not the corrupt DTs) who are killing Ru local? Shocked

Quote from: chimk on October 17, 2019, 02:35:34 AM

and also provided paid bumping service
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5105163.msg52772881#msg52772881

Lie. No bumping, just reviews for money. I showed it here.
A small example of my paid post:

Quote from: KTChampions on August 29, 2017, 05:59:58 PM

Quote from: xplorer79 on August 29, 2017, 05:03:02 PM

Hi TokenTops,
I still don't see the transaction in my wallet after almost 24h, is it normal ?

I got 1$ for 2 reviews, wait about 4 days )

Quote from: KTChampions on August 27, 2017, 08:10:24 AM

https://tokentops.com/ico/betking/
https://tokentops.com/ico/lust/

here we go:

Quote

KTChampions25 august 2017, 00:01
Positive: Good idea. If such unfrastructure will be developed it will be much more safe (for both sides of partnership) to find sex for money.

Negative: Obvious scum. Fake team with stolen pictures. Promotion on bitcointalk from hacked/bought accounts. Spamming thread on bittalk every 3 minutes. Dont answering real questions just keep silence and spamming. Project does not even exist. Everything is fake.

Nice, isn't it? Wink

Once again, I remind you that we had a deal. You avoid its implementation although I have already completed my part. Are you a scammer?

Quote from: KTChampions on October 14, 2019, 11:03:02 PM

And now about you: I answered your two questions, and you promised to answer my two in response. But somehow you dodge it.
May be you want to do it here? So my questions:

Quote from: KTChampions on October 13, 2019, 01:17:15 PM

1.) How is it that when I find a scamer/cheater you dont have time/skills to tag him/look for additional proofs against him (or at least check existing ones), but there is time to rummage through my posts looking for something to complain about?

Let me remind you that this is how you behaved when I caught the serial scamer Smart man. You took the time to defend him, while not checking the info which was a lot about him, in addition, you constantly attacked me and even made a deliberately false report on plagiarism in the hope of getting rid of me.
And now the situation is repeating itself.

2.) Suppose your vile goal is achieved - you find something up on me. Then what? Does this somehow prevent me from continuing to publish information on scamers or being a real crypto enthusiast and discussing a crypto objectively, and not from the point of view of fiat prostitutes who are waiting for one thing from the bitcoin - to increase price rate to merge it and get the desired fiat?