Quote from: nemgun on August 27, 2017, 03:30:27 PM

Quote from: DotNetApp on August 27, 2017, 12:41:28 PM

Quote from: nemgun on August 27, 2017, 12:17:56 PM

Hello, the development is moving well, the thing is that Yani wanted to deliver the wallet, i refused, as i prefer to implement the coins into the DEX and the wall at the same time in order to avoid waste of time. As the wallet is a wrapper who works with the DEX. So when a coin is implemented into the wallet, i have to be implemented in the DEX, this way we keep a clean work, the wallet will be available soon.

For Safenet, we promised to wait for about 4 monts, there is still a little less then 3 months, if it is not ready we will go with our solution. This is what we promised to do.

Hey i like the design and im a really optimistic investor that helped many people on slack and allways tries to help like the coinpayments idea from me

,
But (im not sure if i understand you correctly) its a bit dissapointing for me(and many investors becaus they looked forward to it) that you want to launch the wallet with the validator,
i can understand that at a developers points it is better to do it like this but we got told from the team that the wallet(so bitcoin holding and sending ) will be ready soon, and how can we trust the word
of the team and what they are telling us when its get changed in the last minute? (Hope you can understand what i mean my english isnt the best).
I still will support nvo but im really dissapointed now and just wanted to write it down . :/

There is a smal confusion here, the wallet will come soon, but the way i implement the coins into the wallet have to be done the same way it is on the DEX. To be clear, the wallet will come before the DEX, very soon, it is almost ready, just implementing more coins the same way i implement them on the DEX.

Ah ok thank you for the reply

And sorry for misunderstanding you english isnt my native language

.