Quote from: Lauda on August 27, 2017, 06:36:27 PM

Quote from: shorena on August 27, 2017, 06:33:58 PM

Yes I ignored it.

I'm going to ignore it too then. It works both ways, as long as accounts can be escrowed all is fine I guess. Roll Eyes

Exactly the maturity level I expected from you. You pondered in my general direction and because I didnt reply, you use it now as an excuse to avoid my direct question regarding a trust rating.

Quote from: Quickseller on August 27, 2017, 07:02:33 PM

Quote from: Lauda on August 27, 2017, 06:36:27 PM

Quote from: shorena on August 27, 2017, 06:33:58 PM

Yes I ignored it.

I'm going to ignore it too then.

Quote

-snip-
@Lauda, care to elaborate which rating you are referring to? And if u need a signed message, just ask me.

Removed previously perfectly valid trust ratings in order to manipulate the general history/view. Is in strong support of scammers such as Quickseller. Changing trust ratings on and off based on how he feels on a particular day.
Shorena does not seem alike to the person that I've used to know and have interacted in the past. I've stopped trusting them post their actions and strong support of said scammers.

It sounds like Lauda is unable to backup his rating in *any* way. The rating is fairly clearly retaliatory in nature.

I would suggest involving both Blazed and hilariousandco in the situation, as their credibility will be shot if they allow Lauda to remain on their trust lists.

Just the same intransparent shit as always with Laura, 'you may not know my reasons, but the exist. honest!!! More important people know them'.

Quote from: Vod on August 28, 2017, 05:29:28 AM

Quote from: gorgon666 on August 28, 2017, 05:23:32 AM

I have posted a thread to either have hilariousandco removed from being staff or he remove Lauda from his trust list.

A thread regarding Blazed is forthcoming is Lauda is not removed from his trust list.

Quickseller is now using his alts to pretend he has support for this ridiculous accusation.

If he is not willing to stand behind his complaint, should we take it seriously?

As someone who knows the repercussions of having your - or one users believe to be yours - identity revealed you can maybe understand why someone would try to avoid attribution to an argument that will be ignored because of the person that made it. Its only logical to discredit those giving Lauda their power since a conversation with Lauda is impossible.