Quote from: MPOE-PR on May 13, 2013, 11:37:44 AM

Quote from: SmiGueL on May 13, 2013, 10:23:30 AM

And don't forget the 14+ TH/s on BTCGuild Tongue

'Real-time' graphs website can be found here or clickable versions here.

Actually the BitFury people just announced something to the order of 400 Th as a first batch:

Quote from: baloo_kiev on May 13, 2013, 09:58:23 AM

Quote

Translation: In general, there's almost no limits for sane chip production volumes. One wafer ~4412 chips (how many of them working is still unknown). Maximal production volume which is not hard to order (no extraordinary production planning) is <=2000 wafers per month. Factory will be glad! That's 22 PETAHASH per month. It would be cool to grow to these limits... So there will be no chip crisis. Well, some local crisis may exist, for example we might wait for 2-3 months. We cannot increase number of wafers in an already ordered batch. One of Metabank's goals is to give us a bulk order in June, so we can order right amount of wafers.

You see? They can produce practically any number of chips. So if tomorrow a huge investor or a group of them walk into his place and gives cash for 22 petahash/s... we might see them online in September-October.

That guy has also plunked down an unprecedented $15,000 on a delivery bet with a one month deadline, and yes this is significantly more on a dollar basis than the bet that made Josh Zerlan famous.

For those of you who can't do math (the majority, as we well know), ASICMINER's actually deployed hashing is under 5% of 400TH (more like 3% but hey), and under 0.1% of 22 PH. Which means that if nobody else joins the fray you will be looking at a grandiose under 0.1% of total hashing power by Christmas. Which means about 25 Bitcoin in total revenue per week, distributed over 400,000 shares = 0.000063 BTC per (minus, of course, expenses, which you will provide out of pocket).

The window is closing. Sorry to burst everyone's bubble.

It's actually pretty funny to read your rant/wrong predictions from a few months ago on the other topic.
Obviously, as of today, you're still mad that ASICMINER didn't use mpex since it's better performing better than mpex "all stars" like s.dice (which has been going down for the past 6 months).

Aside from that, you're clearly not objective, as shown in the other topic, since you work for mpex, and you evidently resent ASICMINER for refusing to use mpex and grant you btc.