Quote from: DogecoinMachine on August 30, 2017, 07:43:51 AM

Quote from: coingamblingreviews on August 30, 2017, 07:13:47 AM

What is next? New games? ICO?!

Ico is a no

Sounds like there could be a NoCO Grin

Quote from: DogecoinMachine on August 30, 2017, 07:43:51 AM

games...maybe

Oh, the teasing is real.

Quote from: Petyr Baelish on August 30, 2017, 07:45:03 AM

Everyone can invest in the bankroll already. So why would there be a need for an ICO?

As the topic's a frequently discussed one (especially recently with a few other sides holding ICOs),
I've already given a short statement of my opinion regarding the matter:

Quote from: Lutpin on August 16, 2017, 03:57:33 PM

Quote from: Steelfox7 on August 16, 2017, 03:51:57 AM

Do you plan on having an ICO at any point?

Disclaimer: Personal opinion below, do not mistake for official statement from CG regarding this.

I'm a huge fan of cryptocurrencies and I think blockchain technology can improve a lot of aspects of our life over the next few years/decades.
But, there are limits. And I dislike the current situation where everyone tries to run an ICO for things that do not need to be "tokenized".

Before creating (and investing into) a token/ICO, we should ask ourselves one simple question: Does making this a blockchain token improve how it works?
If a token can provide additional features and improve the experience for users, that's great.

But if not, and if there's a concept being squezed into a token simply because ICOs are currently raising amounts way higher than any regular crowdfund/non-ICO funding,
then I'm out, because that's not what I'm looking for and that's eventually going to collapse and fail.