Quote from: CrazyLoaf on August 30, 2017, 06:44:32 PM

Quote from: generalizethis on August 30, 2017, 12:36:50 PM

As for diluting M to pay for development. I don't want my value cut in half, and I'm sure those who are owed by risto don't want the ability to pay them back cut in half. Some smaller amount like 5-10% might be passable, but not half. And certainly not without a plan for where the funds go and who is managing them--right now, smooth, saddam and mooo are about the only ones I'd trust with that job.

So I don't understand how it looks like we are back to not wanting any dilution on M/CKM. All I did was organize the earlier discussions and move from 60% to 50% dilution and now the concept is terrible? Get a grip. And that 5%-10% crowdfund amount is a joke. No new person would pay for CKM when such a small amount is up for grabs.

What is maddening more than anything else is the complete greed here on assets that are more or less worthless. You don't want to take a haircut at all, but were just fine taking out more than enough to develop the whole damn game for everyone.

Really, the truth of the matter is that you just get off being an argumentative prick.

What are you talking about. I only suggested 10% for Town in the bounty. I never suggested any more and never suggested anything for a crowd fund. I think you have me confused with someone else.

As far as the amount I took from the game, if 1/3 was enough to finance the game, then the 2/3rds I left in the game should be enough to fund the game twice over. I'm not diluting my share to appease you (please stop playing this card unless you want to retroactively change the rules and force people to keep their money in the game--we're all victims of risto, so stop acting like you are the only one-- it's self-righteous and petty).

So far no one wants to dilute the game as you do (smooth may still support it, but even he would want a plan), so my argument is shared--are we all argumentative pricks or are you resorting to ad hominem attacks.