Quote from: Josepht on August 30, 2017, 09:02:33 PM

Who are the parties that disagree about the 1MB or 2MB size? Are those the Core developers?

Bitcoin Core proposed SegWit and opposes increasing the block size limit.

Quote from: elebit on August 30, 2017, 10:00:05 PM

The disagreement is exactly that: It is better work out all concerns that has been put forth as to how this is being implemented, than to try to push a change that many won't agree with. It is better to have one bitcoin, after all.

When people's only justification for opposing forks is that other people oppose them, I know that they have no idea what they're talking about.

Quote from: elebit on August 30, 2017, 10:00:05 PM

The fixed 1MB size is history. Since last week segwit is activate on mainnet, which means the fixed max block size is replaced by a flexible limit of 1-4MB.

If I understand correctly, the concept of Segregated Witness is that it creates a new transaction format which segregates the witness data from the transaction in such a way that legacy nodes don't see it.

So there is still a 1MB max block size for legacy nodes, and therefore you could argue that the max block size remains 1MB - anything else is just about whether people decide to use the new SegWit transactions and run newer nodes.

Quote from: elebit on August 30, 2017, 10:00:05 PM

They are different software projects than bitcoin, with a handful developers all on a single company's payroll.

OP - unless you have further questions, I'd suggest locking this thread to avoid opinionated and arguably ignorant information like this being posted.

Quote from: sammrheza on August 30, 2017, 10:21:39 PM

so we will have 3 bitcoin in my wallet soon ?

No.