Quote from: nmrcngrb on September 01, 2017, 08:56:23 PM

Quote from: 101REcoin on September 01, 2017, 09:15:58 AM

Quote from: nmrcngrb on August 24, 2017, 07:59:51 AM

Quote from: 101REcoin on August 23, 2017, 12:10:54 PM

Quote from: nmrcngrb on August 23, 2017, 07:26:28 AM

I really like coins with real assets for backing.

What I don't understand is how can you guarantee a liquidity ratio of 70% of the currency's market value?
The value of the currency on the market can explode anytime and goes up 50% in a day or more. In a one day time you will not be able to purchase new real estates to back up the market value of the coin. Especially since you did not get new money if currency only changes hands on exchange and rises price.
Can you please explain this since I'm probably not getting it correctly?
Thanks

BTW: links for White Paper and Technical White Paper does not work in the announcement post

Thank you for the really important and urgent question.

First of all, the links are fixed. The site was recently changed and we didn't notice. Sorry for troubles and thank you for information.

Back to your question: from the purely mathematical point of view the things are pretty much like you described, but let's modulate the situation first. The guarantee should only be considered as the "safety parachute", in case the price of tokens drops drastically, or disadvantageous pricing continues for too long. But there are more things that we should take into consideration before making any prognoses.

1. The total token volume value and real estate pool value
2. The connection in price between tokens and real estate works only for tokens, not otherwise, so, in any case, the price of real estate will not be affected
3. It comes from the previous one. Iven if the token market drops drastically, the real estate market won't be affected, which will allow us to have funds needed to cover the required volumes.
4. The last, and probably main argument: to bring you scheme into the reality you will require coordinated actions of holders of critical mass of REcoin tokens, which is very unlikely (almost impossible)

Hope it was helpful, we're waiting for your reply.

Thank you for detailed explanation.
It is clear that it needs a coordinated actions of holders or maybe one investor with sufficient ammout of tokens. What would be done in such a scenario when let's say an investor with sufficient number of tokens wants to claim this? Would you sell the real estate and give him the fiat or can he take the ownership of the real estate? How will you transparently value real estates?

I really like the projects that have some real value behind, but before investing I always have to have a clear picture of the complete story, although I know my questions are not so important at this point in time, since there is a low probability of situations like that. But having a clear picture of this procedures makes coins backed with real assets so special.

Sorry for the long reply*
To begin with, we'll have to do a calculation of whether the total mass of tokens is critical enough for the refund. If yes, then we will do calculations of how much it will affect the market price, and in case that the change is significant enough, we will negotiate with that investor. That negotiation will consider the interests of all sides, but first and foremost, the REcoin community. There are numerous probable results that will lead to the eventual solving of this situation: from gradual step by step refund to the givage of the part of rights. And one could not predict an outcome with a 100% certainty, there are just too many factors that should be taken into consideration.
I hope I answered your question, but let me remind you once again that this situation has a drastically low chance of occurrence.

I understand that it has drastically low chance of occurrence since you assure 80% of market price. That means that if I sell coins on market I will always get 20% more. Correct me if I'm wrong.
But anyway if it comes to claiming the backing real estate, what happens to the coins? Are they dumped at the market or it depends on market situation or is there some other solution?

As for the first part, you are absolutely right, the realization of coins on market is more profitable, you are correct.
And as for the second, if the Real Estate pool becomes smaller, it might affect the price of tokens, but only if the token holders will bet on shorting (play on the slide).