Quote from: ChromaticStar on September 02, 2017, 02:07:00 AM

Quote from: YuTü.Co.in on September 02, 2017, 01:31:41 AM

Quote from: ChromaticStar on September 02, 2017, 01:15:08 AM

Quote

I think Bitconnect has a lot more than 6,000 victims. They had a Facebook account, which now no longer exists, that had over 120,000 likes on it. I wonder what happened to it, even the Facebook link on their website is now dead.

Here's Alexa rankings:

https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/bitconnect.co

It's hard to say how many site views that they have, but it's clear they have a high user base to rank at that level. Bitcointalk.org is in the 4000s and according to this site's statistics, there were already over 5,000,000 page views for the first day of September and there are over 1,000,000 members here. My guess is Bitconnect has somewhere between 250,000 and 500,000 members. Most of them probably don't even have a BCC wallet, why bother to withdrawal when it's a useless coin anywhere else. Deposit BTC, buy BCC, lend BCC, repeat. Bitconnect must hold the majority of BCC themselves.

Why would upwards to 500,000 people become members of BitConnect, yet have no intention of participating in their wonderful program?

That 6,156 figure reflects exactly how many wallets there are to date, with a given that many folks maintain more than one wallet, it's safe to assume that there's less than 6,000 people invested in BitConnect, a majority of those investing the bear minimum - U$100.

Quote

My guess is Bitconnect has somewhere between 250,000 and 500,000 members. Most of them probably don't even have a BCC wallet, why bother to withdrawal when it's a useless coin anywhere else.

Try reading what you pen prior to publishing. Rumor has it that it's all the rage.

Firstly, the second sentence consists of two clauses that's nowhere near similar in nation, ergo no comma - two different sentence. But I assume that in your mind there is a connection, in which case I'm at a lost.

So, up to 500,000 members invested in BitConnect but probably don't have a BCC wallet because ... wait for it ... why bother maintaining a wallet for freshly purchased coins because they aren't worth a rat's ass anywhere else on the Flat-earth.

That might make sense to fellow retards invested in BitConnect, but not for naysayers in the real ball world.

Quote from: S2B on September 02, 2017, 01:07:39 AM

you sound like a bunch of liberal retards. ponzi ponzi ponzi hitler hitler why is it a ponzi and why am i hitler. make an argument stop accusing.

This dude is going all in with showcasing his retardness. Sadly, this guy is in either the conservation for libertarian camp since he just dissed liberals which I'm not one. Please welcome your newest member, Retard S2B.

I'm not promoting this shitcoin, I hate it. I've been blasting Bitconnect for months now.

I don't know how Bitconnect manages their platform wallets, but I assume the "wallet" they give you isn't a separate address that shows up on the blockchain, it's just a number on a spreadsheet. All that being said, Bitconnect must have more than one user for each of their addresses, hence 100,000s of users for just a handful of addresses with coins in them.

Excellent point, albeit disproved by the likes of this dude - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EBIdCNCsGMg - depicting their BCC wallets on YouTube vids, all of which show up on the BCC blockchain.