Quote from: Hypolite on September 02, 2017, 05:58:42 PM

Quote from: B RAD LEE on September 01, 2017, 06:18:41 AM

Awww fck!!! How much research does it take to find something legit?

Did any of you guys read about a couple of RLC team members that were these bad ass coders who've won some hackathon event 2 years in a row? Names Hamid and Mehdi.

Well it turns out their main role was "Marketing" and they've left the project already. Btw, the quote was from one of the remaining RLC guys, not sure who. It was on another forum and he was responding to someone that was calling them out about 2 of their lead developers leaving. Apparently attempting, quite poorly, to smooth things over by replying..."If you're refering to Hamid and Mehdi, yes they are great coders, but it's fine with us that they left. We only really knew them a short time, and while they were here they made valuable contributions in marketing, as well as some other crap.... Bla Bla Bla. Marketing tho.

It didn't take long for me to lose $5,000 on RLC, but for some odd reason I still smiled when he referred to fraudulently adding a couple of big names for the sole purpose of deceiving people into believing they'd assembled this awesome team, and therefore make a shit load of money on their ICO, as "Marketing."

Which brings me to the bit of bull sh*t i found out. You know how you always see these ICO's where these dev's get paid major bank for a product that doesn't even exist, but at least they lock it up in a smart contract for a year to give them a reason to work hard, and I don't know maybe stay with the team after the ICO!. Well RLC decided not to go that route, and to just go ahead and take the money right after the ICO, and even part ways with 2 of their developers already. Unreal!

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm assuming all of this is fact since the poster in the other forum said all of this, and the RLC member that responded did not dispute any of it.

p.s. The part where I said...."fraudulently adding a couple of big names for the sole purpose of deceiving people into believing they'd assembled this awesome team, and therefore make a shit load of money on their ICO. That was my interpretation, and was not said by anyone on the other forum. Though I did think it was obvious that's what was being said, in a read between the lines kind of way.

Big lol !! FUD POWA ! Guys don't think it !!

do not say bullshit, IEXEC has a very serious team and a promising project.

And here is the other guy. FUD POWA? How do you figure? I didn't see fear, uncertainty, or doubt anywhere in my post. It was a fact based post regarding iEx.ec's shitty and scammy ICO. No way will I trust them after that. I lost five grand cuz I don't stick around with a company once I found out they are shady. But you do whatever you want.