Quote from: game-protect on September 04, 2017, 03:20:11 PM

Quote from: SatoshiDICE_PR on September 04, 2017, 01:31:21 AM

Quote from: game-protect on September 03, 2017, 06:45:43 PM

Quote from: SatoshiDICE_PR on September 03, 2017, 07:21:43 AM

Sorry for having been out of touch on what has been happening behind the scenes here.
The new owners of SatoshiDice.com have absolutely nothing to do with Megadice, and are very very very disappointed with the way they treated the brand of what was once the most popular and trusted betting site in the entire Bitcoin Universe. The current site is 100% provably fair with instant deposits and withdrawals.
We deeply regret that Megadice was allowed to tarnish the SatoshiDice reputation, but we will work hard from here on out to rebuild the site into the pillar of the community that it once was.

Any proof that Rakki N.V. has new owners?

If they are very very very disappointed about the previous scammers, why did they buy the domain?

Sorry, I don't know anything about Rakki N.V., and the current owners have nothing to do with Rakki N.V.
My understanding is that the domain name was basically repossessed due to whoever was running it previously not paying their bills to the owner.
Anyhow, the site is in good hands now, and everything is provably fair as well.

I think the community is going to love what we have planned next!

Rakki N.V. was the operator of the satoshidice.com domain for several years.

From who did you purchase the domain if you do not know Rakki N.V.?

I see that the publicly proven satoshidice.com scam hides now the operator!

You claim new owner but you can not prove it. I can also say that I am the emperor of China without any proof.

Why would anyone take over the domain of a publicly proven scam? Does not make any sense!

I tried asking this the OP a few months ago when the transition happened and my question was never answered. They either ignored my post or just brushed it off with an irrelevent answer.

And I still don't believe their reply about how it was "Pure LUCK" that the gambler managed to win over 300 BTC with a single bet.

Either way I would proceed with caution until these issues are cleared up.