Quote from: z0n0 on September 02, 2017, 06:52:52 AM

@mph
Please add ZEN!
It was asked so many times.

The coin itself is getting more and more popular every day, team is very active.
There are few other pools but I would like to mine on yours.

okay. I'll do my best.

Quote from: justvamp on September 02, 2017, 08:05:37 AM

+1 for adding decred.

Almost everyone who mines dagger hashimoto on MPH also mines Decred in dual mode using another pool.
And most of that people would switch to MPH as soon as Decred will be available for mining.

Yeah. Thank you for suggestion. I'll do my best. Shocked

Quote from: hwgeek on September 02, 2017, 01:35:51 PM

I tried mining Zcoin, no matter what did I was only getting 50% of my actual speed and reward, only on this Zcoin subpool, other MPH pools work great 4 me.
used atest TP ccminer.

It's already reported issue from zcoin ccminer users for few months ago.
sgminer doesn't have problem like this.

I already contacted ccminer dev, he also didn't have solution about it. I have no idea what pool can do with this.

Quote from: fonyo on September 02, 2017, 03:25:03 PM

Mr MPH,

Can you please lower the update interval on the API so multipoolminer and similar software can work accurately and efficiently? The current (upto 30 minutes) refresh interval is just too long and causes issues with the calculation of the profitability of some of the coins. Moreover by providing a quicker refresh, multipoolminer in general (and also the users) would benefit from frequently updated (and therefore more accurate) data.

I know you are a busy bee but please prioritise this one. Wink

Thanks.

Actually this caching is done from cloudflare I configured. There's no shorter time interval for this currently.
I'll find better way for this.

Quote from: JohnnyR20 on September 02, 2017, 08:38:17 PM

Quote from: hwgeek on September 02, 2017, 01:35:51 PM

I tried mining Zcoin, no matter what did I was only getting 50% of my actual speed and reward, only on this Zcoin subpool, other MPH pools work great 4 me.
used atest TP ccminer.

Same here. Half of my speed at Zcoin pool. I don't know why, but..
at DGB-GROESTL i have 1900 speed, pool only shows max only 1500.
So cleary pool works bad or dev take more fees..
At another pools like flypool, ethermine all OK.
So problems at pool side Angry

Have you tried static diff? It would be better for digibyte coin.
Also check hashrate from Graphs page. Dashboard and Workers page is not accurate because it samples shares for only last few minutes.

I believe there's no digibyte pool from flypool or ethermine.
hashrate calculation, miner efficiency are totally different between coins.

Quote from: aaronsace on September 02, 2017, 10:38:04 PM

@MiningPoolHub

Please can you check that these algorithms are following the NiceHash stratum protocol to ensure compatibility with Excavator miner:
Equihash - NiceHash and Zpool works but MiningPoolHub does not
Lyra2re2 - NiceHash and Zpool works but MiningPoolHub does not
Ethash - NiceHash works but MiningPoolHub does not

Your Sia pool is also not compatible with anything but Claymore miners.

I'm not familiar with excavator yet but found that it works when I input real IP address instead of pool host name.

I posted issue at their github repository.
https://github.com/nicehash/excavator/issues/51

Very weird bug.

Quote from: BTCconsult on September 03, 2017, 07:27:15 AM

@MiningPoolHub

Yesterday I sent by mistake a BURST of hashpower to 17023 which shows up on my worker's Zcash hashrate graph:

Unfortunately however it seems like I haven't been credited at all for this hashpower.

Is that normal?

I know that sending bursts is NOT the most efficient way of using pools, but getting NOTHING is not quite what I've expected.

Maybe you could elaborate a bit on what has happened there? That would help me a lot in better understanding how exactly your pool works.

Cheers!

Sadly, I think you mined at unlucky time period.
https://zcash.miningpoolhub.com/index.php?page=statistics&action=blocks&height=177937&prev=1

177790 block was found at 20:04:02
177866 block was found at 23:07:13 resulting 409% unlucky block.

As pool uses PPLNS, early hashrates can be totally omitted.
http://give-me-coins.com/support/faq/what-is-pplns/