Wonderful. You've been going after them for months?
You can put anything you want in ToS. If it contradicts the law, it would be reputed null and void.
Does not in this case.
I let you read about "usus" "fructus" and "abusus".
BCH here is the fructus of BTC. Hence as the owner of the said BTC, you are entitled to its product (BCH).
BCH is a product of Bitcoin? What kind of kool-aid have you been drinking?

Indeed, no source for that. They would have been idiots to admit it.
