Quote from: miguelmorales85 on September 07, 2017, 08:50:11 PM

Quote from: reee on September 04, 2017, 08:51:11 PM

Quote from: danielW on September 03, 2017, 09:57:55 AM

Its not because of segwit. Segwit transactions are barely 1% of all transactions. Segwit has made no significant impact on transaction capacity so far.

Exactly.
Simlply in these days there are fewer transactions, it's not that all blocks need to be full.

I think we will see an impact when most of the TX are made between SegWit enabled wallets.

Yep, SegWit transactions have been up to 18% of the total, and we've had many larger than 1MB blocks, but what's holding it back is sites such as Blockchain.info, Coinbase/GDAX, ShapeShift, BitPay, Poloniex, Gemini, Bitfinex, and Purse.io still, to my knowledge, haven't added SegWit receiving/deposit address support. You'd think they'd all want to do it, if only just so that they, themselves, could save on transaction fees -- not to mention being able to sell their users/customers on the ability to save on transaction fees. People should contact any of these companies about adding SegWit addresses -- if we genuinely want to help solve the problem, it's something that these businesses can already do right now.