Quote from: thevictimofuktyranny on September 09, 2017, 12:35:28 PM

Quote from: P00P135 on September 09, 2017, 08:46:39 AM

Quote from: thevictimofuktyranny on September 09, 2017, 02:55:59 AM

Quote from: NavyCuda on September 09, 2017, 01:32:17 AM

Quote from: thevictimofuktyranny on September 08, 2017, 10:36:53 PM

Quote from: th00ber on September 08, 2017, 09:58:21 PM

Update. Vega 56
36MH/s 135W at wall (wattmeter)

-15% powerlimit (But I guess it's not usefull because I reduce a lot the GPU clock, I 'll check the effect of this later
Core 925
Mem 970
Fan 80%

https://imgur.com/a/VCXm7

Setting the GPU core clocks to low impairs share find times!

May make you feel good to see 36mhs, but you won't be getting hashing rewards at that rate!

I guess, you'll need to run it for week to see whether you are getting what the calculator says you should be getting for 36mhs (minus fees).

I reckon it will be something much lower.

I was averaging 2% stale shares with a core clock of 852Mhz with VegaFE.

Take a GTX 1070 as an example: Run it without touching the GPU clock; plus 500mhz on the memory and 65% on power slider.

That will be your baseline for successful solutions sent back to the pool.

Run it with minus 125mhz on the GPU core and plus 500mhz on the memory and 65% on power slider.

It will be 3% less successful at pool doing work and you will get 3% less shares, which equates to 3% less coin rewards.

This is just spreading misinformation. I solo mine Eth on 1070's at 1350mhz Core and they average way above my reported hashrate without any stale shares. You probably are using a shit pool or have a bad connection to it.

It was tested over 6 weeks - at same pool, which I have accurate information on their share proportions for 1 MHS going back 2 years for Ethereum mining.

The average measured, over one month was always 3% lower.

Putting, the GPU core back to it's normal speed and it was 3% higher.

This doesn't prove anything as there are too many other factors to consider.