Quote from: gbfoxbat on September 10, 2017, 09:41:58 AM

Quote from: amir24 on September 09, 2017, 02:11:18 PM

Quote from: Lagduf on September 09, 2017, 01:58:42 PM

Quote from: amir24 on September 04, 2017, 12:29:19 AM

Quote from: jennywhzz on September 03, 2017, 09:25:39 PM

Quote from: amir24 on September 03, 2017, 05:19:08 PM

Quote from: mrayazgul on September 03, 2017, 04:28:31 PM

I think perhaps two projects that we're going to connect to the Healthcare System. I don't know what happened with them, but obviously they're dipping into a business that has a high amount of Regulation. Bitcoin is not much popular in healthcare business yet.

Nothing more regulated than financial industry and this we see successful today already. Full decentralized application like Bitcoin cannot be closed down by even US government

look to bitlicense: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BitLicense
Government make very difficult to start company in New York City but does this stop bitcoin companies? You know answer!

Same thing to healthcare. I not afraid of regulation if application decentralized. Sad to say but I see many centralized healthcare ICOs like Patientory and Bowhead.
Look to MedCredits (MEDX)...look like they will make 100% decentralized and will not be shut down ever Cool

It's a tough nut to crack, and I would say that any project that even got to the first level of approval through the healthcare industry would not become a live functioning project, for at least a couple years until all of the regulation and systemizing was worked out.

Not if decentralized project. Decentralized project not able to shut down. MedCredits without centralization.

What is teh decentralized? can you give an explanation for me? Where from the project gets its decentralized? and they are massively trying to claim that to be the decentralized project even claimed the to be the decentralized medical platform and that was a joke.

What joke? They 100% decentralized medical platform.
They decentralized: payment decentralize, data storage decentralize, doctor credentials decentralize. Find for me someone who control MedCredits network. Medcredits only make software. Once software made they no control of network. Only patient and doctor control.

Like ethereum. Vitalik make software then can not change network (except hard fork)

From Pharma industry perspective as its so regulated there is NO WAY that you can have anything to do with Pharma decentralised. Parts of it yes such as in supply chain and few other stuff but there other stuff such as medical data, Patient data and even Physician data decentralised!!!! Any Pharma company that does or adopts such solution or solutions will be shut down by the likes of FDA and other country specific Pharma regulators. Else people will make candy and sell them as life saving drugs...

Yes, we can ask MEDX dev this but project not say nothing to change pharma. It decentralise doctor/patient. Probably doctor give patient prescription and they get medicine from regular pharmacy. Another project must change pharma I think.

Like my example...it like saying NO WAY ethereum can decentralise apple products. Ethereum still need apple/microsoft to make hardware and iOS/windows. SO ethereum centralized. Of course 1 project not change entire world, yes?