Quote from: freqenqerf on September 12, 2017, 08:43:59 PM

Quote from: kacakkipri on September 12, 2017, 01:42:39 PM

Quote from: freqenqerf on September 11, 2017, 08:28:59 PM

Quote from: kacakkipri on September 11, 2017, 08:24:17 PM

The first six months of 2017 the top 30 grew with 1200%, in the same period Bitcoin grew with 200%. Explains why this project makes sense

Diversification of risks. Bitcoin, like other coins, also falls well, as it grows. Wink

Or do you mean something else?

No. What I'm trying to say is that the mentioned 30 coins are worth much more than bitcoin. You just need not stick to bitcoin. I think it is very sensible to diversification of risks

Yes, now I understand you. Indeed, CombiCoin's advantages lie not only in stability, but also in dependence not only on the bitcoin course.

Quote from: pietpeer on September 12, 2017, 08:16:27 PM

The 50% profit share between Triaconta and the TRIA token holder does seem to look a lot like a (high) performance/management fee or carried interest. So I'm not so sure whether you can state that no (implicit) fees/profits are paid to/withheld by Triaconta.

Do you mean that a high level of transparency for investors about all operations with coins and tokens is needed?

That wasn't the exact point I was trying to make. If someone raises funds for an investment and claims certain things (such as 'there are no fees after you buy a Combicoin') that can seem to be at least open to debate, let's have that debate.

On the transparency point - especially for retail (consumer) investors like myself - transparency on how this coin works and e.g. how costs and profits are being distributed between Triaconta and the investors is indeed key.