Quote from: Lauda on September 20, 2017, 08:45:09 PM

No, there's ~40 days left. You've got your numbers mixed up. Anyhow, SegWit2x has almost zero community support and is nothing other than an attack from Jihan, i.e. takeover attempt. Run Core and avoid those baboons.

Quote from: 24core on September 20, 2017, 09:21:57 PM

It wont be in 10 days. November 18 is around the date we can expect block 494784, which is when Segwit2x should hard fork to 2MB blocks.

Oops, you're right. I'm not sure where I got the September 30th date from.

I do agree with the other voices in this thread that SegWit2x has a right to exist, but as those people have already pointed out, this thread is about personal support.

Quote from: The One on September 20, 2017, 08:29:10 PM

seggy2x is pointless because of BCH.

I actually disagree with you here, because I would support SegWit2x before I supported BCH, simply because of the existence of SegWit and relatively smaller block sizes in 2x.

Quote from: DooMAD on September 20, 2017, 07:53:38 PM

My stance is a fairly liberal one. I'm always inclined to take the position that everyone having complete and total freedom to run whatever code they choose is infinitely preferable to a scenario where one group dictates to all the other groups what they can or can't do. I don't subscribe to the notion some people around here seem to endorse, that one single development team should make all the decisions for the rest of forever and everyone else should obey. I'm happy to endure a little turbulence and open rebellion if it keeps the would-be authoritarians in this community in check.

The miners are perfectly entitled to secure a 2mb base and 6mb witness chain if that's what they want to do with their hashpower. I don't know where anyone gets off thinking they can dictate to other people what chain they have to secure. Similarly, the Core devs are perfectly entitled to change the mining algorithm on the 1mb base and 3mb witness chain making the miner's hardware all but useless on it. In the end, everyone gets what they think they want. At least until they change their mind when it doesn't work out as well as they thought it would. Which could still happen after the fork. The split might be permanent, but it might not. We'll have to see how it plays out.

As for the poll, I support the right for SegWit2x to exist if people want it to. I'm not sure if that's what you had in mind for an answer, though.

I agree with all of your points, even though I may prefer the one chain over the other, what you said is true in my mind.