Quote from: OracionSeis on September 23, 2017, 04:36:22 AM

Quote from: ParRus on September 22, 2017, 10:00:09 PM

Quote from: Elkmar on September 22, 2017, 09:29:06 PM

Quote from: Rigorous on September 22, 2017, 09:02:38 PM

Quote from: Voltaje on September 22, 2017, 06:52:45 PM

Quote from: Elkmar on September 22, 2017, 05:44:10 PM

Good to know the tokens don't have any dividend.

The influence on the price of Bittrex is too important in comparison to the dividends that token can offer.

Well, yeah, the amount of utrust won't give many dividends unless you have a HUGE amount, so that is what I think the reason they didn't go that route, it wouldn't get the token much value, it is better to increase its value with scarcity, burning tokens is a better solution, plus it will give the token an open door to some exchanges like Bitrrex.

This is the first time I hear about dividends in cryptocoins. I know what a dividend is from traditional stocks but what does it mean for cryptocurrencies? And what does it have to do with UTrust?

Well, a lot of ICOs were about dividends, I don't remember much about those project. I think that something called ICONOMi was an example.

I think that those ICO were the problem which bring the USA ICO ban, because those token could be considerate as securitues

bittrex is not only one exchange, they raised the bar too high - now there to receive an invitation to bittrex is not so easy, I certainly believe in the success of the project, and I know they will eventually be there - but team must throw off the importance around this issue, and develop the project - do their work, then everything will be fine

Bittrex not is only option when Poloniex has accepted listed ICO tokens on their exchange. I think Utrust does not need to listed on Bittrex exchange to attrative investors, it can listed on Poloniex if want to does that.

I am not so sure about that dude. You know I have also hear so many rumors and bad news about Poloniex, and that is also why i think the team wants this project to be listed in bittrex instead of Poloniex. Those rumors may be fake or not, but lets consider the investors when they heard such kind of news maybe they will react or had a bad feed back about the project. I agree that one of the factors that affects ones project was about the tokens being listed to some popular exchanges. There is nothing wrong on setting the bars high, besides it has the capability of being included to those exchanges.