Re: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers
Please unvote the following delegates
+ corsaro: 10% share only
+ tembo: 15% share only
+ mrv: 5% share only
+ redsn0w: 10% share only
+ splatters: 10% share only
+ joel: 15%
+ dakk: 15%
+ 4miners.net: 0%
+ cc001: 0%
+ digitron: 0%
+ hmachado: 0%
+ grumlin: 0%
+ goldeneye: 0%
+ liskgate: 0%
+ punkrock: 0%
+ gr33ndrag0n: 0%
All of them are from GDTPool. GDTPool is very bad for voters
+ corsaro: 10% share only
+ tembo: 15% share only
+ mrv: 5% share only
+ redsn0w: 10% share only
+ splatters: 10% share only
+ joel: 15%
+ dakk: 15%
+ 4miners.net: 0%
+ cc001: 0%
+ digitron: 0%
+ hmachado: 0%
+ grumlin: 0%
+ goldeneye: 0%
+ liskgate: 0%
+ punkrock: 0%
+ gr33ndrag0n: 0%
All of them are from GDTPool. GDTPool is very bad for voters
So I'm bad for voters, even though I provide a lot for the lisk community? Including closing Github issues at lisk's beginning, providing lisktools.io (which does need to be updated, but waiting for Lisk 1.0 with new API), and providing the Lisk Android Wallet https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=mrv.liskgdt.wallet
gr33ndrag0n is bad even though he has been the one providing the most reliable snapshots for everyone, makes sure snapshots work with new lisk releases, and has provided alternate wallets and explorer sine the beginning?
hmachado is bad even though he has provided liskak for all delegates to keep their nodes running smoothly
4miners.net is bad even though he has provided great new explorer features and has contributed to closing GitHub issues.
...
I could go on
If you just care about getting percentage returns on your holdings, then I think you are looking for PoS coins
There are ONLY 101 delegates, and i think giving one third of this forging power to 1 POOL only is a very big mistake, moreover when this pool at a whole clearly doesn't want to share its rewards with voters/LSK owners.
I think LSK needs :
More delegates (1000)
Lower voting fees
A mininum sharing of 50% per delegate
I think LSK needs :
More delegates (1000)
Lower voting fees
A mininum sharing of 50% per delegate
-If you are worried about GDT having 1/3 the forging power, I can only image what you think of Elite with over 1/2
You also have to understand GDT is not just a pool, that's the bonus part. We try to make sure our members are actively contributing to the system. Whether it's writing scripts, fixing GitHub issues, doing social media, creating new sites and apps, participating in lisk.chat and helping newcomers, etc.-I agree voting fees need to be lower and everyone hopes they will be with lisk 1.0
-Changing to 1000 delegates is not easy; you are changing the whole consensus of the system by 10x. Also, currently I don't think there are 1000 unique delegates that are running nodes 24/7. You would get a lot of people running multiple nodes since the barrier for entry is so low. At this point too, you might as well just be PoS.
-As for a minimal sharing; that's not the point of DPoS. DPoS is about rewarding delegates that are working hard for the system and actively contributing to it. That's where DPoS has an advantage over PoS. In PoS a lot of people just sit idle and let their wallet get a return like a savings account, since there is no incentive to do more. In DPoS if active delegates aren't working to improve the system, voters should unvote them and get someone else worthy in.