Quote from: coinz101 on September 25, 2017, 06:29:27 PM

Quote from: Bonanzacoin on September 25, 2017, 05:59:01 PM

Then another question:

Is that Nuno message real or not?

Of course its FAKE. Do you think a Nuno as CEO would post this kind of garbage on the official channel of utrust? That screenshot is FAKE and its simple to prove for someone that uses slack on daily basis. On slack it should say ----Today---- above the message and not -----Monday 25 September----- since the screenshot was 'taken'(FAKE) at 12pm from today. 100% fake propaganda. now they are spreading fud about utrust and don't even know how to do a fake image. pump/dump groups targeted monetha today

ps: if you follow utrust daily as I do you will understand that they don't care about monetha and they even said multiple times its a decent project. everyone is concerned about what is the best project instead of realizing they are totally different.

So who exactly are u then?? U are a newbie, but from the getgo ur posts are on UTRUST and Monetha topics.... UR FIRST POST WAS THIS ONE:

Quote

So many people asking so here you go. My personal review of Monetha vs UTRUST:

The Monetha Team:
- Small and not even a single software engineer
The UTRUST Team:
- Large and with a highly technical background

Monetha Whitepaper:
- Confusing and hard to understand if this is something really needed
UTRUST Whitepaper:
- Very clear to understand the model just by glancing at the paper summary

Monetha fees for seller:
- 1.5%
UTRUST fees for seller:
- 1%

Monetha Concept:
- Simplistic view and solves no intrinsic problem.
UTRUST Concept:
- Solves a major problem in crypto payments - Buyer protection for cryptocurrency. This is something that is needed for the mass adoption and doesnt exist. Can be easily used by merchants and private sellers alike.

Monetha accepts:
- Just ETH.
UTRUST accepts:
- All major cryptocurrencies.

Monetha adoption by merchants:
- Limited to merchants that wish to accept ETH and no other cryptocurrencies. Amazon, Ebay, Ali, and many more already have feedback scores, therefore Monethas model will not gain tracking and be adopted by any major merchants. Since it solves no problem, very low appeal to buyers.
UTRUST adoption by merchants:
- Buyers can pay with multiple cryptocurrencies and have a safety net when making their payments, with sellers having a higher selling rate. Will gain organic traction, bringing more clients by referral as they feel more satisfied and protected.

-Monetha adoption by buyers:
- Buyers can only pay with ETH. Feedback score system already exists and solves no problem in practice. Feedback rate is unreliable and subject to false reports and paid bias, as many others.
UTRUST adoption by buyers:
- Buyers can pay with multiple cryptocurrencies. Buyers feel safer making payments with cryptocurrencies knowing that if something goes wrong they can appeal, escalate and be refunded.

If you pay with Monetha and an vendor scams you, the only thing you will be able to do is put a negative review and your money is gone. With UTRUST you will get your money back.

How come this is a newbie´s first post? Wouldnt u like to explore the forum a bit more before u come out with stuff like this?

What is ur motive?