Quote from: bitmaster1x on September 27, 2017, 06:37:38 AM

Quote from: pwpwpw on September 26, 2017, 02:35:00 PM

Quote from: bitmaster1x on September 26, 2017, 02:08:35 AM

Quote from: pwpwpw on September 25, 2017, 10:24:39 PM

I would edit the OP to the current actual annual reward (134%) because that 750% is very misleading for new people.

How is, "Annual Stake Rate - up to 750% (see hyp.presstab.pw for avg paid rate)" misleading?

It's clear as day in what it says.

Well it's "up to 750%" but it's actually 134%. This "up to" is used as a marketing scam to fool the masses who don't read the small fonts, we don't need such things here. I don't mind up to 750% if you put the actual annual rate there as well. I just don't wanna see in the future posts like "omg, I was promised 750% and it's less than 100%, this is a scam!" because I know it's coming once it's more popular.

Regardless the "up to 750%" is in fact the most accurate representation of what's possible. Will "everyone" be able to achieve 750%? No, but some can get pretty damn close for a short while if they're very lucky and always optimizing their strategy. However, that can easily change as well because everyone might have changed what they're doing.

The annual rates are different for everyone and this is due to how people are implementing their own strategy and that is the whole point. For example, you may get on average 134%, I may get on average 400% and Joe Shmoe may only get 89% because he has a terrible strategy and very unlucky. This is what makes HYP dynamic because there are many factors involved and the result of one individual can vary greatly from everyone else.

So, if Joe Shmoe has a terrible strategy, does that make how successful you are in achieving the 134% over his a scam? Does that make the presentation of the information a scam? No. See what I mean. This isn't a static coin/wallet so the annual rate cannot be determined, it can only be averaged for most depending on what people are doing and has already done, but there can also be outliers on the low and high end. One thing we know for sure is that it can never be higher 750% (excluding compounding).

As far as people that complain, because they don't bother reading or don't understand what they're reading that is to be expected especially when there are many people that are not native English speakers. Even native English speakers will complain, because they simply don't bother reading. In such cases, you can't fix stupid. That is just the way the world is and the internet just magnifies the idiots / trolls. That's both good and bad depending on one's perspective. Grin

I'm not saying it's a scam because it says 750%, I'm saying don't even give them a chance to come up with FUD based on the 750%. If you give people nothing to FUD about and they still do, it becomes obvious to everyone. What I'm saying is sort of like, don't feed the trolls.