Quote from: solarrobot on September 29, 2017, 12:44:17 AM

Quote from: DogeMajestic on September 27, 2017, 06:37:18 PM

links on op updated, deeponion.network explorer didn't work any longer.

Guys if you wanna know what's happening to the DeepOnion Price.

It's pretty much the same as https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/torcoin-tor/

Over time, of course, it will go to $0.0x and $0.00x

No value, it's just a 'dev' enrichment process, that's all it is

Block explorer is working. In fact they have two.
I get why some people think DO is a scam, but most of the development has been happening with the forum, and in some ways the community building is really quite impressive. So far the development team has lived up to everything they've put on the roadmap, and all of the funds are transparent, developer addresses all that. People saying that devs have 100's of scam accounts are just trolling, there are only 250 people on the airdrop.

It is kind of an oppressive regime, but they run a tight ship in that regard. If Development doesn't come forward in Q4 like on the roadmap then that will be the end for sure.

Scam though? If it is it is quite elaborate, and if it is, it's more of a sadistic trap than a scam. People work hard for DO, if developers pull through then it will be an awesome coin. If they don't it will be a very sad community, but maybe some one could just fork the project, and fork the community and make a real working network!

Time will tell, for now there is no proof of scam, and i've looked around a lot.

There has been no development. What kind of lies are you trying to sell? Here are the changes since I last analysed their codebase:

Code:

commit e274c40265d46b561aebf7af575d2da9657ee44d
Merge: 931500c 518a6f4
Author: deeponion
Date: Sun Sep 3 16:59:29 2017 -0700

   Merge pull request #10 from chillerfx/master

   Update build-unix.txt

commit 931500ce8196fe6c1bb3dc68ab42ab8b33e1db9a
Merge: d0d33df 7a618bf
Author: deeponion
Date: Sun Sep 3 16:58:05 2017 -0700

   Merge pull request #5 from 420Lord/patch-1

   Update README.md

commit 518a6f4efb516f17b061c185057d66f77517a713
Author: chillerfx
Date: Tue Aug 29 01:03:40 2017 +0300

   Update build-unix.txt

commit 7a618bf3ce8c43a5824aac37e66a892a513e636b
Author: 420Lord <31207152+420Lord@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon Aug 21 11:56:22 2017 +0200

   Update README.md

   Fixed some grammatical errors

Updating README and build text files...Fucking sad.

And then you will say "well what about the latest commit?", which I will show here:

Code:

bf3a8c85dd2b701fa6720e1c2c7f18281a14
Author: deeponion
Date: Tue Sep 5 00:30:45 2017 -0700

minor maintenance release, with more recent checkpoints and minor fixes

Well lets see inside!

Code:

diff --git a/src/checkpoints.cpp b/src/checkpoints.cpp
index d8a1ee5..f41825f 100644
--- a/src/checkpoints.cpp
+++ b/src/checkpoints.cpp
@@ -25,10 +25,11 @@ namespace Checkpoints
   boost::assign::map_list_of
   ( 0, hashGenesisBlock )
   ( 1000, uint256("0x0000000000850dc77a9601bc78cc6404bf24923475194c392accdb
176c8e74da"))
- ( 4000, uint256("0x00000000001e00d978b6746fb7af2b9d566cc7c6f0bb04e952ff28
5853412be8"))
- ( 7000, uint256("0x0000000000039021cf0ceb46e1b64086b5b67150ce005813c911b9
5830374f88"))
- ( 9530, uint256("0x000000000007c0df7894a390d592099090e15e6ec631fc71af3199
b8ffabb483"))
- (10990, uint256("0x00000000003f7dc2648315fa41a9032ee7d28b2efec25b46cda292
81d2b59d5d"))
+ (10011, uint256("0x00000000003010c108b5de62eef6c69a173a34d1c68932571dc475
6e1f243903"))
+ (30001, uint256("0x000000000019c8741a4aa87170e0598802b40a7476bfe4fb082fa9
0c954a0260"))
+ (50008, uint256("0x00000000000a70b080e12cab200125ecffeebfae7c7fe7c914311a
2b1056cf5b"))
+ (70005, uint256("0x00000000000197c958de95bad1b4cf4d7d4f1f18f432e11846245c
8669b4473b"))
+ (78842, uint256("0x000000000002919668d4e78eb2aa9aa752b0f72cde01ba08f23a05
c1801c7347"))
   ;

   // TestNet has no checkpoints
diff --git a/src/clientversion.h b/src/clientversion.h
index 6de17d2..7761f6e 100644
--- a/src/clientversion.h
+++ b/src/clientversion.h
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@

// These need to be macros, as version.cpp's and bitcoin-qt.rc's voodoo requires it
#define CLIENT_VERSION_MAJOR 1
-#define CLIENT_VERSION_MINOR 1
+#define CLIENT_VERSION_MINOR 2
#define CLIENT_VERSION_REVISION 0
#define CLIENT_VERSION_BUILD 0

diff --git a/src/kernel.cpp b/src/kernel.cpp
index 300138a..744f618 100644
--- a/src/kernel.cpp
+++ b/src/kernel.cpp
@@ -19,10 +19,11 @@ static std::map mapStakeModifierCheckpoints =
   boost::assign::map_list_of
   ( 0, 0xfd11f4e7u)
   ( 1000, 0x353653feu)
- ( 4000, 0x32ecbf74u)
- ( 7000, 0x34569266u)
- ( 9530, 0x33943f15u)
- (10990, 0xd0452b51u)
+ (10011, 0x5f22713eu)
+ (30001, 0xceb87179u)
+ (50008, 0x9f0053f2u)
+ (70005, 0xd005d7f9u)
+ (78842, 0x008147b4u)
   ;

// Hard checkpoints of stake modifiers to ensure they are deterministic (testNet)
diff --git a/src/main.cpp b/src/main.cpp
index d26ff5c..7ee6ef6 100644
--- a/src/main.cpp
+++ b/src/main.cpp
@@ -81,11 +81,17 @@ int64_t nTransactionFee = MIN_TX_FEE;
int64_t nReserveBalance = 0;
int64_t nMinimumInputValue = 0;

-static const int NUM_OF_POW_CHECKPOINT = 2;
+static const int NUM_OF_POW_CHECKPOINT = 8;
static const int checkpointPoWHeight[NUM_OF_POW_CHECKPOINT][2] =
{
- { 5675, 3630},
- { 9601, 4611}
+ { 9601, 4611},
+ {19767, 6631},
+ {30931, 8792},
+ {41366, 10850},
+ {50420, 13156},
+ {60229, 15420},
+ {70072, 17469},
+ {78842, 19751}
};

extern enum Checkpoints::CPMode CheckpointsMode;
@@ -1029,9 +1035,7 @@ int GetPowHeightTable(const CBlockIndex* pindex)
int GetPowHeight(const CBlockIndex* pindex)
{
   int powH = 0;
- // powH = GetSpecialHeight(pindex, false);
   powH = GetPowHeightTable(pindex);
-
   return powH;
}

1. Checkpoints updated (check)
2. Minor fixes?? It's a single line change. Who knows how this affects PoW, which could mean more coins mined.

And that's it.

Don't try digging DeepOnion out of its grave.

Oh yeah, their "DeepSend" feature is late. STILL waiting to see it! hahaha.