Quote from: Dark12 on September 28, 2017, 04:03:23 PM

Quote from: coreshift on September 28, 2017, 03:52:17 PM

Quote from: borderline on September 28, 2017, 03:48:04 PM

Quote from: coreshift on September 28, 2017, 03:44:21 PM

Cryptodevil claimed SIGT is a clone-coin. When asked what coin it's a clone of he finally looks at the code and sees it's derived from Blakecoin. He had no idea before then. Being a "clone-coin" is a meaningless standard for claiming SIGT is a scam since EVERY coin is derived from BTC or a derivative of BTC. Every coin is a "clone-coin". Nobody is going to rewrite the blockchain code from scratch. That would be idiotic.

He claims the exchange is being manipulated by bots and that this is evidence that SIGT is a scam. Even if it was being manipulated that is not evidence the devs are manipulating it. It's not evidence of scam. Almost every coin's price gets manipulated by bots or whales at various times.

He claims that a new algorithm is not "innovative" because SIGT has a short PoW timeframe. A new algorithm IS innovative regardless of the length of time it's used. Regardless, lack of innovation would not be evidence of a scam.

He claims anyone that questions his "evidence" is somehow in on the scam he has no evidence of.

the problem it's nota clone coin the problem is i ask about this image thi avatare and i was banned from discord and telegram.. in if you see my last post i always defenden signatum... this is...

I seriously doubt the (very out of context) exchange quoted was why you were banned.

perfect my game !!!