Quote from: APICEMTECH on September 28, 2017, 06:10:28 PM

Quote from: nioschka on September 26, 2017, 09:47:41 AM

Quote from: miKcrypto on September 26, 2017, 02:36:35 AM

Quote from: cjmoles on September 25, 2017, 09:11:35 PM

Warning --->There seems to be some serious problems with the accounting methods of this ICO ---> it appears they are conjuring their numbers. It's either the Blackmoon Crypto team or it's the ICOrewards team ---> but the figures are being manipulated and it can be verified. I will give them some time to resolve the issue before I publish the proofs, but it doesn't seem they will be responsive at this time<---- Warning

I saw my bounty reward change a few times but that was during calculation. Going to have to see this damning proof you have or else its just FUD. Patiently waiting...

Well I don't believe BMC team is doing that on purpose - they seem like good fellows, and I don't see how few swindled tokens could benefit them after the very successful campaign. I think it's the incompetence of the junior social management team and that "innovative" bs bounty platform rather than any malicious intention from their side.

I am sure that they cooked the books. The ICOREWARD people, not BMC in particular. They have been kicking people out of their telegram chat who raise questions about the fairness and transparency of bounty distribution. The stakes were inflated on purpose in the last weak so that not many tokens have to be given to bounty hunters. I suspect and my calculations and also the calculations made by other bounty members and also posted by one of them in the icoreward telegram chat shows that they have decreased the tokens for bounty members by 1/3rd, and inflated the stakes 3x to do so. When you ask them about it, they say that the entire mechanism which was built earlier was made for 3 categories and they had to redo it for 6 categories(those who are in the bounty will understand what i am talking about). However, if you ask them to make the database of posts public, so that it can be audited by one of the community members, they avoid the question and do not reply to it. A few people who were persistent in asking the fairness of distribution were even kicked out of the chat. Even worse is the attitude of ICOREWARD team, one of their team members called the bounty members as, "Blood sucking wives who are getting greedy". The BMC community manager had to intervene and then the above comment was deleted from the chat. To summaries, BMC guys are genuine, but the ICOREWARD team has diverted the tokens to other accounts those do not belong to any of the bounty members who actually participated in the campaign.
BEWARE OF JOINING ANY OF THE CAMPAIGNS BY ICOREWARDS. THEY ARE NOT TRUSTWORTHY

Yep, I got a similar impression about the ICOReward team. At first I thought they were plain clumsy and inexperienced (or hopefully stoned :-)) because they had made some totally absurd mistakes with my stake balance (which they've corrected after I had pointed out to them). Afterwards, they mixed together 3 categories on one hand and 2 categories on the other, but they somehow corrected that, too. Their platform is not transparent and they make lots of mistakes - these are the irrefutable facts. I don't know about these "ghost accounts" but hopefully some manager from BMC will take a peek at their calculations (I mean - into how many languages has BMC WP been translated? The value of the stakes for the translation bounty campaign is ridiculously low comparing to the other ICOs). Maybe the're simply stoned all the time :-)