Quote from: cryptodevil on September 29, 2017, 06:35:01 AM

Quote from: coreshift on September 28, 2017, 03:44:21 PM

lack of innovation would not be evidence of a scam.

Which part of claiming re-skinned white-label 'Marketplace' and 'Web-Wallet' browser code as being 'Our Technology' suggests innovation?

Quote

Let alone 'Revolutionary' innovation:

Quote

If the sole claim of innovation is that the 'dev' selected a different bunch of algorithms for the brief PoW period and you believe that equates to a viable economic platform of value for this coin to build on, I suggest you reconsider putting quite so much stock in your deeply-held beliefs, as they are clearly akin to becoming religious in nature at this point.

I was pointing out, as was very clear in my post, that a new algorithm is innovative. You falsely claimed it was not because of the short PoW phase. I continued on by saying lack of innovation is not evidence of a scam. I said nothing about it being successful or not. Not being successful is also not evidence of a scam. Just FYI.

Quote

So, in that this entire project has been touted as being revolutionary and innovative, in order to pimp the market-price while 'dev team' profited from selling their mined bags to naive newbies, the absence of anything revolutionary or innovative is, indeed, evidence of scam.

What total BS. You know absolutely nothing about marketing and advertising. EVERY new product claims it's somehow different from others of its kind. IT'S NOT EVIDENCE OF A SCAM. If it was then pretty much EVERY new product being marketed anywhere is a scam.

I notice you didn't address my responses to your other imagined evidence of a scam. This is the best you've got?