Quote from: Matthew N. Wright on May 22, 2013, 08:40:31 PM

Quote from: Phinnaeus Gage on May 22, 2013, 08:36:55 PM

Quote from: Matthew N. Wright on May 22, 2013, 08:28:27 PM

Quote from: ondratra on May 22, 2013, 08:18:50 PM

TradeFortress has an own site ripplescam.org/‎ where he explains his point of view.

Imho Ripple sux and lot of people will lose their their coins in a future.

I don't recall him ever publicly stating that was his site. TradeFortress, is that your site?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=180287.0

Thank you Bruno. That should wrap up that one pretty well. So TradeFortress has been accused of paying people money to change their post content to his own anti-Ripple website by GoWest basically. I guess we just have to wait to hear TradeFortress's rebuttals. He said something about not messaging GoWest directly, but he didn't deny paying others.

Matthew, i don't know why TF would pay someone half a grand to say Ripple's a scam, when there's already a frickin' Greek chorus chanting the same thing. Rewards of adding another voice are slim to none, and the potential shitstorm if the shill turned on him -- spectacular. The odds of anyone being that rich & that stupid simultaneously are pretty slim, but irrelevant.

A better question is why tf would YOU start this thread? I mean, sure, clickbate, the subject line just screams tabloid, drama, attention is fun. But your faux neutral tone really turned this post into sleaze.

"It has come to my attention that a member of this forum, TF, is a child molester, so you might wana to protect your loli. More ugly accusations against the pedo could be found http://here and http://here. Please withhold forming your opinion until I ask the filthy baby-fucker to just have a seat over there, as he babbles some lame-ass excuses. In the meantime, please form an organized mob, boil tar & pluck chickens."

I remember you giving TF some sagacious advice, comparing his Ripple troll to your welched bet. Something about fucking with other people's money.
Here's a curious factoid for you: In a shrewdness (pack) of apes, when a weak ape is attacked, he tries to redirect the attack to target a weaker/less dominant ape. That behavior is considered appropriate for socially well-adjusted apes.

Or are you just trolling? (in which case Embarrassed

)