Quote from: BillyBobZorton on October 01, 2017, 02:35:01 PM

Quote from: dothebeats on September 30, 2017, 03:27:20 PM

Quote from: cashodler on September 30, 2017, 02:58:11 PM

Quote from: dothebeats on September 30, 2017, 02:11:43 PM

Well there hasn't been any statements in regards to ICOs, just regular cryptocurrencies so I don't know where are you basing your thoughts about ICOs. Also, that's just two days from now so we're still not sure whether China will reconsider their decisions that fast, though they're notoriously known to change their rulings in an instant.

If this is true though then what happened in China rumors and bans were just an orchestrated FUD by the Chinese officials and investors.

Wow, are you a real pajeet? Pajeets are stupid like you, I dont know anyone that stupid to think there is September 31 like the article says.

October 1 in China is in 40 minutes, not 2 days, pajeet.

A typo error, but my argument still stands: their stance against ICOs wouldn't change, but trading cryptocurrencies would be regulated and not be banned as opposed to their initial statements. And I'm not a pajeet, not even an Indian so I don't know why you're too butthurt when someone pointed out something that doesn't exist. Next time, try to read everything carefully before trying to shill out the coins that you support. Wink

I still believe their stances on ICOs will change, mostly because other countries will allow for ICOs, even if properly regulated, and maybe one of these ICO's turns out to be a billion dollar success and the country that didn't allow it will look like a good damn idiot for life.

Not all ICOs have to be scams, even if I dont like the way coins are issued this way, and if most are indeed scams.

In the fact, there are have too many cryptocurrency created by the ICO market, what do you think from limit 800 crypto increase to more than 1100 crypto as now? Almost new crypto are from ICO project, there is have not new crypto own a platform like Nebilo recently.