Quote from: natural9 on October 03, 2017, 06:33:57 AM

Quote from: BFree_ICO on October 03, 2017, 02:52:40 AM

Quote from: RoosterRed on October 03, 2017, 02:36:06 AM

You are welcome to try writing that yourself. That is at least 20 pages with information that isn't publicly available. If you want more in-depth, critical articles, you can look at my work on Kyber, Bancor, Icon, and Red Pulse.

Well to critisize is always easier than actually to do the job.

Even if criticism is justified, it can be expressed in different ways. I've read some stuff of you and I like it. Sure, when the things change the articles lose their relevance, but it does'nt mean at all they were not useful and informative at the time they were published.

Oh trust me, it wasn’t useful at all. Don’t publish anything if you can’t take the criticisms. It’s not a launch of their presale or ICO, only then will explaining the whitepaper be relevant. Saying you have more in-depth articles does not
make your (TenX vs centra vs Monaco) article more compelling.

I want to see you do this: "Again factoring the milestones executed(achieved), progression in the company, updates with the tech, price, market cap and supply of each coin and you’ll understand why I think Monaco is heavily overpriced."

It is OK if you can't give a number, as you would need non-public information to price something this way. I want to see you even just model it. For kicks. You posture like you have this advanced pricing model in your head. I would love to take a look at it. I don't think it exists.

Listen, this was the most basic articles I have written, but it isn't useless. The Monaco whitepaper has disappeared from its site. Centra's whitepaper is literally incorrect (or they are lying in chat, pick). It is basic info, but it is basic info you can't get if you searched for it right now.