Quote from: vikingchild on October 03, 2017, 09:44:43 AM

Cryptovore is not a promotional website. Nor do I work to create fake hype.

So answer the question I ask in my previous post:

Quote from: cryptodevil on October 03, 2017, 07:25:19 AM

Quote from: vikingchild on October 03, 2017, 12:34:26 AM

New Article Out! Past, Present, Future - This is Signatum - The Complete Status Update

http://cryptovore.com/2017/10/02/signatum-and-its-future-overview/

Dan, I'm still on the fence about your role in this pump-and-dump scam. I'm torn between you simply not giving a shit about it being so blatant a scam because you're making money off it, or you are just one epic noob who seriously cannot bring himself to even consider how deep into this scam he's allowed himself to be drawn.

Quote

Continuous Progress on Roadmap Deliverables

A list of roadmap items have been provided below along with their updated status. Six out of the eleven Roadmap V1 items have already been delivered or are being worked on. Signatum Marketplace was launched in Beta mode a few weeks back and is currently working out a few quirks and will therefore remain in Beta for a while still. The most recent addition to the marketplace include Escrow payments in order to protect both the buyer and seller. A list of deliverables promised for Beta V2 has been listed on the ANN thread on Bitcointalk here.

Project dedicated explorer STATUS: Completed 24th July 2017 - [cut and paste code]
Whitepaper task assigned to community members STATUS: Completed 2nd August 2017 - [not actually a 'whitepaper' and is devoid of anything of substance]
Update Website STATUS: Completed 2nd August 2017 - [hardly relevant to mention website updates]
Signatum Marketplace where people can trade goods and services using SIGT currency STATUS: Still in Beta and under development but has been launched in Beta.- [cut and paste code]
Better Anonymity network with more Tor nodes STATUS: Completed 24th August 2017 - [more cut and paste code and, btw, TOR wallet routing has been a thing since early versions of the original bitcoin wallet]

See, the thing is, posting article after article blindly shilling for Signatum, along with a bunch of other clonecoins you're promoting on your cryptovore.com website, makes it less believable you are an innocent in all this, but then your willingness to be publicly associated with your actual real-life identity in doing so, suggests either a staggeringly arrogant degree of not giving a shit or, as I said, you truly are just a noob of such epic proportions that you've been fooled into investing so much of your own money, time and effort into defending this coin that you can't accept the facts.

Let me give you a quick history lesson. Perhaps that would help you and others like you to understand the truth of the situation.

This is Carsen Klock:

https://github.com/carsenk

Quote

Carsen used to make quite the living copy-pasting other peoples code, making minor changes to it and then launching it as a new [insert revolutionary/innovative blurb here]. PoW/PoS clonecoins with multiple hashing algorithms, for example.

Quote from: webcoinx14 on July 19, 2014, 09:30:12 PM

Quote from: bathrobehero on July 19, 2014, 09:19:45 PM

Would you list all the coins you launched so far?

Yes of course: My entry to the crypto-world in order is:
Timecoin (Scrypt based, terrible clone)
Matrixcoin (Sha256 based, terrible clone)
Hashcoin (X11 based, first animated logo, DGW V3, coin ended up forking due to no one updating to the latest wallet from all the FUD, coin could still work)
Dreamcoin (X11 based first PoW/PoS crypto I created, HUGE amount of FUD with threats, so I removed the coin to hurt the community because I was hurt, which was wrong, looks like community took it over though, still working)
Nebulacoin (X13 based PoW/PoS, Still lives on to this day)
Techcoin (X13 based PoW/PoS, Still lives on to this day, looks like the community is taking it over, fixing block times (it was too slow)).
Firecoin (X15 based first PoW/PoS, block times were faster, smoother launch, FUD killed it)
Isiscoin (X15 based PoW/PoS, smooth launch, hit Mintpal second day of ninja launch (No bribes were made), Premine was dumped before we hit Mintpal (which a lot of people thought i dumped on mintpal, I did not), HUGE FUD followed, along with government talk of Isiscoin, Death Threats, etc. Bad choice of name and bad launch date made me remove this coin, also because I do not support terrorism and that is what people were thinking. Just overall bad ideas on my end, My intention was the Egyptian god ISIS but as you all know, people twist things around)
Webcoin (X14 PoW/PoS, By far my best coin ever, Extremely stable, Smooth launch, Fair distribution)

Any other coin is not made by me, these are the only coins I have worked on.

The process involved launching multiple coins as being 'new' in some way, with a variety of configurations in terms of whether it had pre-mine, instamine, 'dev rewards' etc. Releasing a slow and steady stream of 'features' and 'services' to make it look like there was legitimate development work going on (all just more copy-pasted code of other people's work) and then abandoning each coin once he'd managed to get as much profit out of it as he could.

I propose you click on that link above to Carsen's GitHub repo. That bitcointalk forum post was from over three years ago. His GitHub repo has been active this entire time and is still currently active, chock-full of forked code, from 'multi-algo' clonecoins, to 'webwallet' and 'payment gateway' services.

Which part of Signatum differentiates from every single cut-and-paste pump-and-dump committed by Carsen Klock over the past 3+ years?

If you're genuinely claiming to not be blindly shilling for Signatum then you should be able to easily differentiate it from all those other pump-and-dump coins Carsen Klock was crapping out back in 2014.

P.S. "wE R haVe KoMmuNiTy" is exactly the same vapid nonsense the newbies and shills used to parrot for them, too.