Quote from: AnotherJohnDoe on October 03, 2017, 06:53:27 PM

If the above view is correct,

It is not.

Quote from: AnotherJohnDoe on October 03, 2017, 06:53:27 PM

can this situation evolve into a threat? (Fewer and fewer full nodes).

Possibly, but currently unlikely.

Quote from: AnotherJohnDoe on October 03, 2017, 06:53:27 PM

[/b]Are there other cryptos providing an implementation closer to "one-cpu-one-vote" ?[/b]

Altcoins?

Go ask in the altcoin sub-forum. I don't pay any attention to those scams.

Quote from: AnotherJohnDoe on October 03, 2017, 06:53:27 PM

The original intention of Satoshi was "one-cpu-one-vote". Everybody would run the same full node and would simultaneously mine and have a chance for a mining fee.

That is not Satoshi's intention.

He said so himself, right here in this forum.

Take a look for yourself:

Quote from: satoshi on May 18, 2010, 08:06:46 PM

- snip -
Simplified Payment Verification is for lightweight client-only users who only do transactions and don't generate and don't participate in the node network. They wouldn't need to download blocks, just the hash chain, which is currently about 2MB and very quick to verify (less than a second to verify the whole chain). If the network becomes very large, like over 100,000 nodes, this is what we'll use to allow common users to do transactions without being full blown nodes. At that stage, most users should start running client-only software and only the specialist server farms keep running full network nodes, kind of like how the usenet network has consolidated.
- snip -

Quote from: satoshi on July 14, 2010, 09:10:52 PM

The design outlines a lightweight client that does not need the full block chain. In the design PDF it's called Simplified Payment Verification. The lightweight client can send and receive transactions, it just can't generate blocks. It does not need to trust a node to verify payments, it can still verify them itself.

- snip -

For now, everyone just runs a full network node.

I anticipate there will never be more than 100K nodes, probably less. It will reach an equilibrium where it's not worth it for more nodes to join in. The rest will be lightweight clients, which could be millions.

At equilibrium size, many nodes will be server farms with one or two network nodes that feed the rest of the farm over a LAN.

Quote from: satoshi on July 29, 2010, 02:00:38 AM

The current system where every user is a network node is not the intended configuration for large scale. That would be like every Usenet user runs their own NNTP server. The design supports letting users just be users. The more burden it is to run a node, the fewer nodes there will be. Those few nodes will be big server farms. The rest will be client nodes that only do transactions and don't generate.
- snip -

Emphasis in bold added by me.