Quote from: qwik2learn on October 10, 2017, 03:23:12 AM

Quote from: Astargath on October 09, 2017, 11:15:06 PM

Quote from: qwik2learn on October 09, 2017, 07:58:52 PM

Quote from: Astargath on October 09, 2017, 10:09:57 AM

Quote from: qwik2learn on October 08, 2017, 07:41:37 PM

Quote from: protokol on October 08, 2017, 10:06:59 AM

So why do you think that is the case? I think it's because the hypotheses are unrepeatable, and to be frank, woo.

You mean the experiments are not repeatable? You should try one and see for yourself, this experiment I posted is about as easy as it gets.

Quote from: protokol on October 08, 2017, 10:06:59 AM

You cannot ingest qubits. They are a conceptual idea of information, not an actual physical thing. Like the classic "bit" they are just a form of information, not a physical, tangible piece of matter that you can hold or eat.

OK, I should have made this more clear: Since the ORMEs have quantum properties and ingesting them effects the mind, this implies that the ORMEs are interacting with the qubit state of tubulin.

Specifically, Orch OR proposes that tubulin proteins comprising microtubule cylindrical lattices function as 'bits' -- switching between alternative states (e.g. of 1 or 0), as well as quantum bits or 'qubits' (existing transiently as quantum superposition of both 1 AND 0).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXFFbxoHp3s

Which one is repeatable? You posted a bunch of personal experiences of some people that you can't even know if they are actually true or not, that's not repeatable. If telekinesis was real, for example, it would be so easy to prove, everyone would know by know it exists, you would see people do it all the time in real life, you wouldn't even need to really prove it.

The experiment I just mentioned is about ingesting ORMEs, you can try it on yourself and repeat it on a daily basis until you are convinced that there is something inside the sea salt which affects the mind.

Regarding TK, the evidence goes back to the 19th century, many eminent researchers have conducted their own tests:
https://www.quora.com/Is-telekinesis-scientifically-true/answers/17777933
Another good link mentioned in another answer to that question:
http://www.thiaoouba.com/kir.htm

Another good link : https://www.quora.com/Is-telekinesis-scientifically-true

There is no evidence, get over it, if scientists have really been conducting successful experiments til now then we wouldn't need to believe in it or not, it would be proven and it would be used, telekinesis would have enormous applications that I have yet not seen and you neither.

You chose to ignore the evidence in the links I posted. I cannot help that.

Eminent and capable scientists have really been conducting successful experiments from the 19th century til now. I sourced my claim by pointing to many important tests. What have you done about it? You just literally said "I don't care about the evidence, I will not believe any of it until there are widespread applications". That is not how science works.

Where are the applications.