Quote from: gjhiggins on October 10, 2017, 02:20:48 AM

Quote from: cinogrin on October 10, 2017, 01:24:16 AM

That'd be true if I was out to prove it to you. I'm not. Wink

Think I'm lying or incorrect? Cool with me! I'm not out to tear down HLM, I mentioned my observation, many weeks after the fact, and how I had written it off. It didn't have to be a conversation.

It remains important to the people whose reputation you have casually impugned, including me. I don't want it said later that I failed to act with propriety so I must press you for some details. You claim to see a correlation but in what? How did those with inside knowledge profit from this insider trading? Can you narrow down the period of time to a specific day or couple of days at least?

Cheers

Graham

Oh sweetie, you are a very professional and cordial soul - and I honestly appreciate/respect that despite not being capable of such class myself, but if my off-hand comment is going to throw a wrench in the team's morale we've got a lot bigger issues than someone making 12 grand in August before anyone else could. I suppose it could've just been coincidence. I'm not going to scroll back through slack to find timestamps for you. I'm not nearly as invested in my claim as you are, and maybe it was just bad timing and I'm a guy who assumes the worst. I figured it was clear, but to make it explicit people sell when they know there is a delay, because they know some percentage of speculators will also do the same thing and re-enter later, so when you see some decent volume move in a counter-intuitive direction, and then find out a short time later there has been a delay, and then the previously counter-intuitive volume trend continues and now makes sense with the revealed information, you may be able to appreciate why my assumption was the worst. We're talking chump change in the grand scheme of things and hey maybe it was indeed just bad timing.