Quote from: gjhiggins on October 10, 2017, 09:49:36 AM

Quote from: cinogrin on October 10, 2017, 02:53:22 AM

First one to dump when the delay was known, before the community knew. Not really sure how else to say that... do you not think that would be insider trading?

Well some might consider it be --- if you can explain how knowledge of the delay leads to an opportunity to exploit that delay - by dumping at that point? Shrewd move, I must admit I didn't spot that opportunity to come out ahead of everyone else by exploiting my secret insider knowledge .

when the delay was known, before the community knew. Wow, you have a panopticon, that's cool - can I have a go on it? Oh, you don't have a panopticon, oh well then, these are matters you cannot possibly have knowledge of, your suspicions really are baseless.

Let's remind ourselves of your false accusations of criminality:

Quote from: cinogrin on October 09, 2017, 10:03:04 PM

pretty obvious insider trading of SPR based on the delays of the snapshots being pushed back a couple times ... it's clear some people acted on information before the community was given the opportunity to

This is a false accusation of potentially criminal behaviour by people you refuse to name and you are unable to prove your accusations when challenged to do so.

I don't take kindly to my reputation being brought into question by being the subject of baseless accusations of criminal behaviour.

It was a stupid and thoughtless act to publicly post false accusations of criminality that you cannot prove, that's a long, long way away from the kind of FUD that's often tolerated here.

Cheers

Graham

Insider trading a cryptocurrency is criminal activity? In what jurisdiction?