Quote from: sidhujag on October 10, 2017, 06:06:00 AM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on October 10, 2017, 04:50:47 AM

[edited out].

Forgive me I am a developer. Its in my nature to be cryptic. I also hate typing and im INTJ. I say just the necessary for those.that understand.

These are not really great excuses for your failure and refusal to communicate clearly on a public forum, and then blame me because I am asking for clarification, specifics and elaboration.

Think about your comment that you say things only for those who understand (or are at your level) comes off as quite pretentious and even presumptive that you are either smarter than other people or that your unique perspective is special.

The fact of the matter is that each of us has perspectives, and sure some people are smarter than others, but I would not necessarily conclude that I am smarter than someone else based on a manner of communicating or knowing certain secret things, and likely a sign of social and communicative intelligence is actually begging able to explain points that you make. You are the one that made the points regarding the supposed dependency relationship of bitcoin to the alt coin market, not me, and I was just criticizing your point or alternatively attempting to obtain some clarification through my criticism of such point(s).

Quote from: sidhujag on October 10, 2017, 06:06:00 AM

Its not pro alts.. its pro crypto.

You seem to be getting caught up on semantics, here, and maybe at some point both of us loses whatever the fuck the earlier points were.

I think in recent times, I have been becoming more and more critical of others who go down the path of conflating various cryptos and acting as if bitcoin just happens to be one of the many crypto options. It is a form of either failing and/or refusing to recognize distinguishing aspects of bitcoin or purposefully framing false equivalencies in order to either denigrate bitcoin or to pump alt coin trashes by acting like they are nearly the same thing.. blah blah blah.

By the way, I have no problem with the concept of being pro-crypto or even being excited about the many possible contributions of a variety of alt coin projects and ICOs... so long as we can recognize some of the scam marketing going on with a lot of them, too. If we try to act as if they are all legit and not motivated by perverted marketing, then likely we are either perpetuating myths, living in a fantasy or possibly purposefully scheming.

Quote from: sidhujag on October 10, 2017, 06:06:00 AM

Perhaps im more confident in it because ive been waiting for this exact setup since 2013.

Out of your own imagination, you are trying to describe some kind of pattern that likely does not exist and is largely based on a figment of your imagination - perhaps even with a fallacy of trying to put too much emphasis in predicting the future on some kind of self-selected past pattern that you believe to exist - again a kind of false equivalency in suggesting that there is some kind of rule that alts must pump at the same time as bitcoin or some variation of that nonsense that is no rule at all, but only something that you are hoping will happen without any real evidence to support it... and even if you end up being correct and it happens, it does not mean that it was either inevitable or that you predicted it properly... but yeah, guys like you who fail to speak in specifics, seem to always be able to later proclaim that whatever nonsense you were predicting ended up being correct... Roll Eyes

Quote from: sidhujag on October 10, 2017, 06:06:00 AM

Its like in 2010 i was saying you better buy US on forexfactory to anyone I knew. I saw fundamentally that USD and us equities would rise together even though that made no sense in context. However it did happen.

Why does it matter? Do you have some kind of inferiority complex that you need to describe yourself as some kind of insightful deity?

Are you trying to sell a consultation service or something?

Yeah, great, we can sometimes see a trend or a pattern and we can place some of our additional money in the direction that we believe is more likely to occur... great.. nothing wrong with that.

Hopefully, you realize that in the end, these are a bunch of probable outcomes, and maybe you were able to predict a more likely outcome, and once the outcome takes place, it becomes 100% - however, nothing is 100% when it is in the prediction mode, and each of us come to differing conclusions regarding what kind of probability we assign to a specific outcome and maybe even how comfortable we are in concluding a certain outcome, whether it is assigning 60% to 70% or some narrower or broader range depending on our confidence level and the extent to which we feel that we understand a large number (or not) of the material factors that goes into making such a prediction about a future event.

Quote from: sidhujag on October 10, 2017, 06:06:00 AM

Ive been planning for this specific wave since 2013 (its the big one if alts and.btc to up together, until they dont)

Sure it is possible that you could be correct, maybe a 30% chance or something like that, or maybe I am wrong and there is a 70% chance that you are correct; however, I would not put all of my eggs in a basket that is predicting something based on historical events and also circumstances that have changed too, and have you actually accounted for important and material factors in making you prediction?

Quote from: sidhujag on October 10, 2017, 06:06:00 AM

Dm me and we can get on a call and chat.

I see no reason for that. Sometimes if there is progress being made, then perhaps some kind of direct private discussion or chat could be useful - otherwise I don't see the point.

I made my points and you made your points, and my points seem better than yours... hahahhahahaa Cheesy

Quote from: sidhujag on October 10, 2017, 06:06:00 AM

Not typing it up here. No time for that.

Yes.. I see you are not really able to back up your various conclusions, and I am not even sure if it matters that much, except the fact that you are speaking in conclusory nonsense and trying to identify a pattern that likely does not exist and has perhaps a 30% or so chance of playing out.

Quote from: sidhujag on October 10, 2017, 06:06:00 AM

Its not rocket science really..

Of course, simplifying markets and human behavior is not rocket science. You can say whatever the fuck you want and you can predict whatever the fuck you want, but does not mean that you know what you are talking about merely because you assert your conclusions without giving any kind of meaningful basis regarding how you got there besides your amorphous and wishful thinking about sensing a pattern that altcoins and bitcoin pumps together.

Quote from: sidhujag on October 10, 2017, 06:06:00 AM

but perhaps I took it for granted that others can also see it.

Well, that is one of the things that happens when you communicate in amorphous conclusions. There are some people who might agree with your various premises and conclusions and others who will not.

Quote from: sidhujag on October 10, 2017, 06:06:00 AM

Anyways chat later if you want.

I don't mind sticking with the public thread. I don't see any point to chatting privately about this particular topic.