Quote from: qwik2learn on October 10, 2017, 10:18:10 PM

Quote from: Astargath on October 10, 2017, 04:16:02 PM

Quote from: qwik2learn on October 10, 2017, 03:36:46 PM

Quote from: Astargath on October 10, 2017, 03:22:52 PM

Where are the applications.

Science is not about applications. It is about evaluating evidence and making observations. I showed you the tests, now you must evaluate the evidence and come to a conclusion. There is no logical reason to reject the wealth of evidence I have presented.

In fact I already showed some applications in this link: http://www.thiaoouba.com/kir.htm

Before arguing the point, try reading the evidence.

An obscure webpage about magic, go figure. One day you will learn the fact that magic is not real, maybe it takes you 20 years but I guarantee you, you will never see someone perform telekinesis stop being ridiculous, real scientists have stopped looking into it decades ago.

Real scientists like Crookes have been conducting tests since the 19th century. These Russian researchers are using Kirlian photography, not magic... Why do you reject the evidence without examining it?

They have and they realized telekinesis is bullshit that's why no one is talking about it anymore, only nutjobs like you. I'm a random person, you don't need me to examine the evidence, other real scientists have and they have got to the conclusion that it doesn't exist. Psychokinesis experiments have historically been criticized for lack of proper controls and repeatability.[7][8][9][10] There is no convincing evidence that psychokinesis is a real phenomenon, and the topic is generally regarded as pseudoscience.[7][11][12][13]
There is a broad scientific consensus that PK research, and parapsychology more generally, have not produced a reliable, repeatable demonstration

The ideas of psychokinesis and telekinesis violate several well-established laws of physics, including the inverse square law, the second law of thermodynamics, and the conservation of momentum.[79][91] Because of this, scientists have demanded a high standard of evidence for PK, in line with Marcello Truzzi's dictum "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof".[10][92] The Occam's razor law of parsimony in scientific explanations of phenomena suggests that the explanation of PK in terms of ordinary ways by trickery, special effects or by poor experimental design is preferable to accepting that the laws of physics should be rewritten

Internationally there are individual skeptics of the paranormal and skeptics' organizations who offer cash prize money for demonstration of the existence of an extraordinary psychic power, such as psychokinesis.[110] Prizes have been offered specifically for PK demonstrations: for example, businessman Gerald Fleming's offer of £250,000 to Uri Geller if he can bend a spoon under controlled conditions.[111] The James Randi Educational Foundation offered the One Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge to any accepted candidate who managed to produce a paranormal event in a controlled, mutually agreed upon experiment.

Please, stop believing in magic, you are an adult.