Quote from: DarkTrollCoin on October 12, 2017, 07:54:01 AM

Quote from: Big Naturals on October 12, 2017, 06:56:36 AM

All the -70% activity spanking doesn't do much for community building, too early for punishment. The history of airdrop coins being successful without innovation is very poor, there's so much competition now, and when more than 50% of the community realise while they were waiting for direction from the dev they had their pants pulled down and their bums smacked for lack of 'activity', many will stop paying attention here.

For better or worse the dev must lead and show direction, at least at the start. When I see people getting enthusiastic and evangelising an 'unknown' project I smell insincerity and BS. @dev, you lead first and then spank the inactive community members later, not before the fucking project has even started!

-70% wasn't to "spank" anyone... That penalty isn't applied to those who lack activity.
-70% is applied to those who failed to do the 2 mandatory votes as it was explained in the OP (i believe there's no explanation anymore in the OP as the applications are over)

There's no penalty for those who lack activity. Only for those who didn't vote.
We are building a DAO. We have a voice to govern it by voting and 3/4 of the people who went in for a quick buck are not reading or doing anything and expecting to have the whole cake...

It was stated since the beginning that if you don't vote, you'll be penalized.
Don't spread fake infos please Wink

I completly agree... The minimum that was asked from people was to vote and let their voice heard... They were capable of signing up to the airdrop but unable to write a message for the 1 vote? We could be talking about the 70% if its fair or not but in my point of view the hard penalty is a must...