Quote from: Anon136 on May 28, 2013, 05:46:06 PM

Quote from: ktttn on May 20, 2013, 10:13:19 AM

*Deep breath*
A factory takeover is always a peaceful, organized process if the profiteer being deposed has the good sense to gtfo, and doesn't call in the riot cops, instead opting to let the rightful owners, the workers, take over.
It is shameful ignorance to say riot cops show up in response to violence. As a rule, with negligible exceptions, the police instigate the violence. Can't have a riot without riot cops. Can't have capitalism either. Ive been arrested twice, both times in NYC parks during riots that started after the storm troopers marched in.
Rothbard, if I run into it in one of my republican (token cheap shot at "ancaps") buddies' houses, I swear to you personally I will read. I mean this
Until then, we make our own points. Yes?
Also, Bakunin>Marx. I raise you a Kropotkin and half a deCleyre.
You're a CEO? Cool. Seriously, cool. Fortune 500,000,000 I presume? Less than 1000 wagesla- er
..employees?
Not the same thing or even the same order of thing as the examples I mentioned. To claim the state does not facilitate capitalism is due to a misindoctrination.
The Capitalist invented the wage slave, darlin.'

so wait. if i build a piece of capital and then hire people to operate it, the moment i do so the capital ceases to be my property and becomes their property instead? If this was ever reflected in law you could be sure that no sane person would ever build a factory and a society with no factories would be very poor indeed.

You're ok 'till you get to the end of your last sentence -- i guess that would be part two of your compound conclusion.
The answer's no. No sane person would ever hoard enough capital to build a factory, which is the desired result. Don't know about OP, but i'm open for business -- ask away.