..snip...
Incorrect. This isn't about my feelings. This is about the definition of freedom, and how I am not expanding that definition onto an abstraction, then removing the reference to that abstraction and calling it the definition. Is that more clear?
Here is an example:
Freedom from necessity would mean a guarantee of a minimal standard of living to all.
Freedom does not include a guarantee of a strong minimal standard of living to all.
You think the Danes are wrong then? That your definition of freedom is better than theirs?