Quote from: JwJimJim on October 14, 2017, 02:18:26 PM

Quote from: DGBforver on October 14, 2017, 04:24:31 AM

Quote from: Danuberiver on October 13, 2017, 08:03:28 PM

Quote from: Danuberiver on October 12, 2017, 08:46:04 PM

Gulden is good at development but crypto is not about innovation. It is a currency and it only need to work and have limited supply. Without much development EFL has a higher price at 1970 satoshi and Gulden with all it's development is at 1800 satoshi.

Introducing halving like ELF does more for value then any development. People want scarce money not helicopter money.

Gulden developers can develop their balls off but too much supply destroys value.

Today ELF (changed so post doesn't get deleted) moved up with btc to 3500 sat and NLG drop to 1700 sat. This is with ELF focus on people and not blockchain innovation.

Not true, digibyte has a higher marketcap because we released SegWit first , it could of been Gulden but the devs thought they could do better then the bitcoin devs by creating a version that reduces block space by 58% and not 25% as per their dev page.

6 months later people are still waiting for this magic bullet , don't be shocked if only PoW2 is launched with bitcoins SegWit.

Gulden was first to update to 0.13 codebase but GRS was first to add SegWit. Digibyte was 4th or 5th but marketed the update better then the other coins.

Gulden did a lot of development in 2016 and this is why the coin managed top 20, if they kept the same speed in 2017 there would be less QQ in here.

You do know this project is like 5 times bigger then anything else released in crypto this year?